ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN THE SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS PREPARED BY NYPPL

November 04, 2011

Employer’s failing to promulgate rules of conduct addressing prohibited conduct a mitigating factor in setting disciplinary penalty


Employer’s failing to promulgate rules of conduct addressing prohibited conduct a mitigating factor in setting disciplinary penalty
NYC School Construction Authority v Ray, OATH Index # 2188/11

The New York City School Construction Authority alleged that one of its project managers purchased unapproved equipment for his own use and misusing the purchasing process.

Although the manager contended that all the purchases he made were for legitimate business use, OATH Administrative Law Judge Tynia D. Richard found that a number of the purchased items, including a notebook computer, a DVD read/write multi-recorder, an Internet radio, and a Keurig coffee maker, were purchased without authorization and for the manager’s personal benefit.

Judge Richard also found that, although all of the items remained in the work trailer, they were unreasonable purchases for administration of a city contract.

Concluding that the manager’s actions constituted serious misconduct, she recommended a 60-day suspension without pay but did not recommend termination, as sought by the agency.

Judge Richard explained that the agency had failed to adopt rules of conduct that would put project officers on notice that such acts constituted misconduct that could result in termination and the manager’s contrition showed that such rules would have deterred him from undertaking such misconduct.

The decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://archive.citylaw.org/oath/11_Cases/11-2188.pdf

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the decisions summarized here. Accordingly, these summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law Blog Editor Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; and Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
Copyright 2009-2024 - Public Employment Law Press. Email: nyppl@nycap.rr.com.