TO SEARCH this database type in a key word or phrase in the box in the upper left and any material containing the word or phrase will be displayed for your review.
State of New York vs. COVID-19 - Governor Andrew M. Cuomo periodically updates New Yorkers on the state's progress during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The latest reports of the number of new cases, the percentage of tests that were positive and many other relevant data points concerning COVID-19 are available at forward.ny.gov.
N.B. §22 of the New York State's General Construction Law, in pertinent part, provides that “Whenever words of the masculine or feminine gender appear in any law, rule or regulation, unless the sense of the sentence indicates otherwise, they shall be deemed to refer to both male or female persons.” NYPPL applies this protocol to individuals referred to in a decision self-identifying as LGBTQA+.
May 11, 2010
Guidelines applicable in selecting or rejecting applicants for employment having a criminal record
Matter of Boatman v New York State Dept. of Educ., 2010 NY Slip Op 03523, decided on April 29, 2010, Appellate Division, Third Department
Correction Law §752 bars the denial of a license or employment application based solely upon an applicant's criminal record unless there is "a direct relationship between one or more of the previous criminal offenses and the specific license or employment sought" (Correction Law §752 ), or where granting the license or employment application would "involve an unreasonable risk to property or to the safety or welfare of specific individuals or the general public."*
In August 2007, Kenneth L. Boatman was hired by the City of Syracuse School District as a temporary custodian.** Boatman later sought a permanent appointment and was told his employment was contingent upon a criminal background check and receipt of clearance from Department of Education.
The criminal background check revealed that Boatman had a 1989 felony conviction for dangerous drugs in Georgia and two New York convictions, one for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree in 1993 and one for criminal mischief in 1997. As a result, the Department of Education advised Boatman that its clearance would be denied unless Boatman provided the Department with “satisfactory information indicating why clearance should be granted.***
Ultimately the Education Department denied Boatman clearance for employment on the ground that his employment would "involve an unreasonable risk to the safety and welfare of the students and staff of the District."
Boatman sued, contending that the Department's determination was arbitrary and capricious. Finding that the record was insufficient regarding the particulars of petitioner's convictions and that respondents failed to apply the appropriate statutory factors, When Supreme Court granted Boatman’s petition and remitted the matter to the Department for further proceedings after finding that it had not applied the “appropriate statutory factors, the Education Department appealed.
The Appellate Division said that a judicial review of the administrative decision denying Boatman clearance for employment is limited to whether the decision is arbitrary and capricious. On the other hand, if the court finds that the determination is supported by a rational basis, it "may not substitute its judgment for that of the board or body it reviews," but must sustain the determination.
In this instance, said the Appellate Division, the Department is required to apply the eight enumerated factors**** set out in §753(1) of the Correction Law together with any "certificate of relief from disabilities or a certificate of good conduct issued to the applicant, which certificate shall create a presumption of rehabilitation in regard to the offense or offenses specified therein."
The court then explained that "When all eight factors are considered and the positive factors are balanced against the negative factors, the resulting decision is neither arbitrary nor capricious nor does it constitute an abuse of discretion and reviewing courts may not reweigh the factors and substitute their judgment for that of the agency."
Finding that there was a rational basis for the Department's determination to deny Boatmen clearance, the Appellate Division reversed the Supreme Court's judgment and dismissed Boatman’s appeal.
* §50.4(d) of the Civil Service Law authorizes the state civil service department and municipal commissions to refuse to examine an applicant, or after examination to certify an eligible, who is guilty of a crime. However the first unnumbered paragraph set out in §50.4(d) provides that "No person shall be disqualified pursuant to this subdivision unless he or she has been given a written statement of the reasons therefor and afforded an opportunity to make an explanation and to submit facts in opposition to such disqualification."
** As to a temporary appointment, typically a school board may, upon the recommendation of the superintendent, conditionally appoint a prospective employee. A request for conditional clearance is to be forwarded to the Commissioner of Education, along with the prospective employee's fingerprints [see, for example, Education Law §1604.39.b.].
*** Other than the certificate of relief from disabilities from the 1993 conviction, Boatmen did not submit any information regarding his prior convictions, the underlying circumstances or evidence of rehabilitation.
**** The eight factors to be considered concerning a previous criminal conviction:
1. The public policy of this state, as expressed in this act, to encourage the licensure and employment of persons previously convicted of one or more criminal offenses;
2. The specific duties and responsibilities necessarily related to the license or employment sought or held by the person;
3. The bearing, if any, the criminal offense or offenses for which the person was previously convicted will have on his fitness or ability to perform one or more such duties or responsibilities;
4. The time which has elapsed since the occurrence of the criminal offense or offenses;
5. The age of the person at the time of occurrence of the criminal offense or offenses;
6. The seriousness of the offense or offenses;
7. Any information produced by the person, or produced on his behalf, in regard to his rehabilitation and good conduct; and
8. The legitimate interest of the public agency or private employer in protecting property, and the safety and welfare of specific individuals or the general public.
The decision is posted on the Internet at:
Paid Family Leave Webinars for Employers and HR Professionals -- Webinars are offered by the New York State Workers’ Compensation Board. Sign up for a free session to be held on Wednesday, January 20, 2021: 12:00 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. or Tuesday, February 9, 2021: 12:00 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. Submit your required registration form by clicking: Registration
Wild Thoughts by Julia Randall. A three-part series on wilderness ethics and management offers a comprehensive review of wilderness as a legal concept, an ecological condition and as a cultural phenomenon. Click on the following links to access Part I, What is Wilderness; Part II, For Whom Does Wilderness Exist?; and Part III, Wilderness and a Livable World. Ms. Randall's StoryMap can be found on the Adirondack Council’s website at: https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/39efc4883ac348a09fbd03a0f2c6c78f
The Steel Bar is the epic story of the rise and fall and rebirth of the Pittsburgh lawyer, from the earliest days of the Pittsburgh bar to the modern era, against the backdrop of American history." More at https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/2020/02/the-steel-bar-pittsburgh-lawyers-and_28.html
Contaminants of Emergent Concern was discussed by Dr. Robert A. Michaels [firstname.lastname@example.org] at the New York State Bar Association, Energy and Environmental Law Section on January 31, 2020. Dr. Michaels' remarks are posted for viewing/downloading at no charge at the following URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339055672_Legacy_Contaminants_of_Emergent_Concern. Other articles addressing environmental issues by Dr. Michaels are posted on on the Internet at:https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/2020/01/articles-by-dr-robert-michaels-nypers.html
Ransomware continues assault against cities and businesses - take a look at the most recent attacks, how US and international cities have handled them, and advice for dealing with the aftermath. Keep reading.
Social Effects and Outcomes of Identity and ID Programs - Download this impact report that details research, use cases and tips for creating a successful municipal and government ID program to better transact with citizens by clicking here: Government ID Impact Report
New technology assists local governments to better serve its residents by using new technologies to save money, communicate with residents and allow taxpayers to make payment. Click here to download a report released on September 16, 2019 by New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli.
Governing Daily has posted a link to an item, How to Prevent Job Loss in the Public Sector, noting that when budgets get slashed and hiring comes to a halt, municipalities need a way protect their most valuable resources – people and finances. [Content provided by CentralSquare Technologies.] Click here to LEARN MORE
A CyberCemetery: The University of North Texas Libraries and the U.S. Government Printing Office, as part of the Federal Depository Library Program, created a partnership to provide permanent public access to the Internet sites and publications of defunct
Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or additions or amendments to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed or otherwise have had an impact on the decisions summarized here. Accordingly, these summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, REMEMBER THAT CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG.
THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material in New York Public Personnel Law is presented with the understanding that the publisher, editor, contributors or members of the staff are not providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is advised to seek such advice from a competent professional.