Reporting threats of violence by a disgruntled employee to the police
Aviles v Cornell Forge Co., CA7, 241 F.3d 589
Violence at the work site is a growing concern to both employers and employees.
The Aviles case involves an employer's fear of such violence after it learned that a disgruntled employee, Alfredo Aviles, had threatened a supervisor and was seen standing outside the building. The police were called and arrested Aviles. Aviles then sued the employer, Cornell Forge Co., for alleged unlawful discrimination based on his national origin and claimed that the Cornell had called the police in retaliation for his filing a hostile work environment claim.
These were the essential elements alleged in the Aviles case.
Aviles contended that he was the victim of unlawful discrimination because "calling the police to report that a disgruntled employee is waiting outside the workplace and may be armed is an adverse action as a matter of law."
The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed with Aviles' theory, ruling that a truthful, nondiscriminatory report to the police should not subject an employer to Title VII liability.
According to the decision, such theory is "ill-advised." If, said the court, an employer had to face potential Title VII liability for truthfully reporting to the police that a disgruntled employee had threatened a supervisor and could be armed, it probably would discourage employers from taking the most prudent action to protect themselves and others in the workplace.
In contrast, the court said that a false report to the police could be construed as a retaliatory action meant to dissuade Aviles from pursuing his EEOC charge against the company.
The court affirmed the district court's granting a directed verdict in favor of Cornell Forge.