Employment contracts in public education
Brousseau v Shenendehowa CSD, Decisions of the Commissioner of Education #14193
The Shenendehowa Central School District and its Director of Finance, Susan M. Martin, signed an “employment agreement” for the period May 13, 1998 through June 30, 1999 setting out the terms and conditions of Martin’s employment with the district. The agreement also provided that it could be “renewed annually thereafter.”
Eugene Brousseau challenged the authority of the school board to enter into such an agreement with its Director of Finance. He asked Commissioner of Education Richard P. Mills to rescind the agreement. The district, in support of its action, argued that it had authority under Education Law Section 1709(33) “to enter into employment agreements establishing the terms of employment for its employees.”
The Commissioner commenced his analysis by commenting that “there are a limited number of provisions in the Education Law that expressly authorize a board of education to employ specified individuals” such as librarians, “qualified teachers,” an auditor and a superintendent.
However, said the Commissioner, the fact that there are no express provisions for the employment of individuals other than those specifically provided for by law “does not foreclose a board from employing individuals in such positions as are necessary to operate and maintain the school district, because the employment of such persons is a reasonable and necessary means for the board to fulfill its duty to superintend, manage, and control the affairs of the district pursuant to [Education Law] Section 1709(33).”
The Commissioner dismissed Brousseau’s appeal noting that:
1. The authority to contract with employees is implicit in the act of employing such individuals -- hiring an individual “itself creates a contract, whether express or implied, oral or written;”
2. A board of education, “as a public authority,” has a common-law right to contract with teachers and other necessary personnel;” and
3. A board of education may enter into contracts with its employees “to the extent the contract is not inconsistent with other statutory conditions,” citing Courtemanche v Enlarged City School District of Middletown, 686 F.Supp.2d 1025.
Therefore, the Shenendehowa board’s entering into a contract with Martin concerning the terms and conditions of her employment “is authorized as an implicit, reasonably necessary power of the board ... and in addition is authorized pursuant to the board’s common law right to contract.”
.