OATH administrative law judge recommends an award of $500 for the de minimis retaliation by supervisor against employee
NYC Commission on Human Rights, ex rel. Cerullo v Fricione, OATH Index ## . 1865/10 & 1866/10
An alleged violation of New York City’s Human Rights Law was initiated by the New York City Commission on Human Rights (“the Commission”), pursuant to section 8-109(h) of the Administrative Code and section 1-71 of the Commission’s rules, 47 RCNY §1-71(a). Human Rights and heard by OATH Administrative Law Judge Faye Lewis.
Theresa Cerullo and Gregory Cerullo, A husband and wife who worked together on the custodial staff of a public high school brought claims of gender discrimination and retaliation against their supervisor.
ALJ Faye Lewis found that Mrs. Cerullo’s claims of gender discrimination were not proved. Although the supervisor was at times unpleasant, Judge Lewis decided that Mrs. Cerullo failed to prove that he treated men and women differently in the workplace.
However, Mrs. Cerullo proved that respondent took away Mr. Cerullo’s keys to the back room and garage in retaliation for Mr. Cerullo’s complaints about perceived discriminatory treatment against his wife.
Mrs. Cerullo, however, failed to prove that the supervisors retaliated against her husband by decreasing his overtime.
Judge Lewis recommended a $500 damage award for the de minimis retaliation proved by Mrs. Cerullo.
The decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://archive.citylaw.org/oath/10_Cases/10-1865.pdf
NYPPL