Finding different employees guilty of the same misconduct does not require the appointing authority's imposing the same penalty on the individuals
Meagher v Safir, 272 AD2d 114
One of the issues in the Justin Meagher’s appeal from the disciplinary penalty imposed upon him by the New York City Commissioner of Police was that his punishment was the forfeiture of ten days of vacation while the penalty imposed on another officer involved in the same event was the loss of five days of vacation.*
Both officers, who were partners, were found guilty of using excessive force in making a particular arrest.
The Appellate Division held that the record provides no basis for imposing different penalties on the two police officers involved in this incident. Rather, said the court, the record indicated that appointing authority’s designee, the First Deputy Commissioner, improperly cited [Meagher’s] election to pursue an administrative trial as justification for the higher penalty.
The Appellate Division, concluding that the penalty imposed on Meagher was disproportionate to the offense. Rather than remand the case to the department for the imposition of a new penalty, the Appellate Division elected to exercise its discretion and changed the penalty to be imposed on Meagher to the loss of five days vacation.**
* In addition, the record indicates that the department discontinued its scholarship support for Meagher’s law school tuition as a result of his being found guilty of misconduct.
** Apparently, however, the court did not reinstate the Department’s scholarship support of Meagher’s law school tuition.