Click HERE to access the full text of the Appellate Division's decision.
December 15, 2021
The failure to initiate a timely CPLR Article 78 challenging a final administrative decision requires the dismissal of the complaint
The Appellate Division concluded that petitioner's cause of action alleging that the appointing authority unlawfully terminated his probationary employment — a decision made by administrative determination — is time-barred as petitioner was terminated "almost 15 months before bringing this action, and a challenge to an administrative determination on the ground that it is contrary to law is subject to a four-month statute of limitations."
Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the decisions summarized here. Accordingly, these summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material in this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor members of the staff are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is advised to seek such advice from a competent professional.