Second Circuit Court of Appeals holds New York State's Board of Law Examiners has Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity

No. 22-1661

T.W., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, DIANE BOSSE, JOHN J. MCALARY, BRYAN WILLIAMS, ROBERT MCMILLEN, E. LEO MILONAS, MICHAEL COLODNER, Defendants-Appellees.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

ARGUED: JUNE 5, 2023 DECIDED: JULY 19, 2024

Before: LIVINGSTON, Chief Judge, and NARDINI, Circuit Judge.*

Below is the summary of  the ruling preceding the court's decision.

"T.W. sued Defendant-Appellee the New York State Board of Law Examiners alleging, inter alia, that the Board violated Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act by denying her requests for certain accommodations on the New York State bar examination in 2013 and 2014. 

"The Board moved to dismiss T.W.’s complaint, asserting that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Raymond J. Dearie, District Judge) lacked subject matter jurisdiction because New York’s sovereign immunity barred T.W.’s ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims under the Eleventh Amendment. The district court denied the Board’s motion to dismiss, but this Court reversed, holding that the Board was immune from suit under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act** and remanding for consideration of the Board’s motion to dismiss as to T.W.’s Title II claim under the ADA. On remand, the district court granted the Board’s motion to dismiss, holding that the Board is entitled to immunity as an “arm of the state,” that Title II does not abrogate the Board’s sovereign immunity for money damages as applied to T.W.’s claim, and that T.W. could not maintain her requests for declaratory and injunctive relief under Ex parte Young. 

"On appeal, T.W. argues that the Board is not an arm of the state, and even if it were an arm of the state, Title II has abrogated Eleventh Amendment immunity in the context of T.W.’s claim. In addition, T.W. argues that even if the Board enjoys sovereign immunity, she may seek her requested declaratory and injunctive relief under Ex parte Young. We disagree and therefore AFFIRM the July 21, 2022, judgment of the district court."

* Judge Rosemary S. Pooler, originally a member of this Second Circuit panel, passed away on August 10, 2023. The two remaining members of the panel, who are in agreement, determined the matter. See 28 U.S.C. § 46(d); 2d Cir. IOP E(b); United States v. Desimone, 140 F.3d 457, 458–59 (2d Cir. 1998). 

** The Circuit Court found that the Board was not a program or activity of a department or agency that receives federal funds and was therefore immune from suit pursuant to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.

Click HERE to access the text of the Second Circuit decision posted on the Internet.