ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN THE SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS PREPARED BY NYPPL

September 02, 2021

An Education Law §306 appeal to the Commissioner of Education will be dismissed if not properly served

The Petitioner in this appeal to the Commissioner of Education sought the removal of a member of the Board of Education [Member] alleging the Member uttered an obscenity in response to comments made by Petitioner.  

Petitioner's complainant alleged that Member directed “[u]nprofessional, rude, and vulgar language” toward her in response to her questions.  As redress, Petitioner asked the Commissioner [1] to remove the Member from the board; [2] bar the Member from running and serving on any school board in the future; and [3] give Petitioner a written apology for his unprofessional behavior.

Member, conceding that he used an obscenity but denied making the specific remark attributed to him by Petitioner, contended that Petitioner's appeal must be dismissed for a number of reasons including "improper service." 

The Commissioner agree that the appeal must be dismissed "for lack of personal service" as §275.8 (a) of the Commissioner’s regulations requires that "the petition be personally served upon each named respondent." Noting that Petitioner’s affidavit of service indicates that the petition was sent by U.S.mail and there was no evidence that Petitioner made any other attempt at effectuating service. Significantly, the Commissioner pointed out that "service by U.S.mail" does not constitute valid service of a petition pursuant to Education Law §306.

The Commissioner then noted that even assuming that Petitioner effected valid service on the district clerk, this would not constitute service on Member.  Citing 8 NYCRR 275.8[a], the Commissioner said that although a district clerk is authorized to accept service on behalf of the board of education, "the district clerk generally cannot do so for individual respondents."

Observing that Petitioner's application must be denied on procedural grounds, the Commissioner opined that Member’s conduct "was entirely inappropriate, particularly for a member of a board of education" and admonish Member “to comport himself in the future in a manner befitting a holder of public office.”

Click HEREto access the full text of the Commissioner's decision.

September 01, 2021

New York's Governor Kathy Hochul announces new senior administration appointments

On September 1, 2021, Governor Kathy Hochul announced two senior appointments to her administration. 

Kathryn Garcia has been appointed Director of State Operations. Previously, she served as the Commissioner of the New York City Department of Sanitation, leading its 9,700 uniformed and civilian employees. Over the course of more than six years at the helm, Ms. Garcia led the department through nearly 15 feet of snow, expanded environmental programs from e-waste collection to the largest curbside organics program and implemented innovative technology solutions to manage the both its personnel and fleet. In addition to her duties at the Department of Sanitation, she served as the City's Lead Czar, developing a plan to eliminate childhood elevated blood lead levels, and during the winter of 2019, she also stepped in as the interim Chair of the New York City Housing Authority to begin implementation of an agreement with the federal government. During the pandemic, Commissioner Garcia served as the COVID-19 Food Czar, delivering over 1 million meals a day to hungry New Yorkers. A lifelong New Yorker, Commissioner Garcia launched her career as an intern at the Department of Sanitation. Before returning to the Department as Commissioner, she served as Chief Operating Officer at the New York City Department of Environmental Protection, where she was responsible for the operation of the City's water supply, water and sewer system, and wastewater treatment plants. Prior to her service at DEP, Garcia was Vice President at Appleseed. Commissioner Garcia earned her B.A. at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Neysa Alsina, Esq. has been appointed Special Advisor on Pandemic Relief.

Ms. Alsina previously served as chief counsel to the New York City Comptroller, overseeing the Office's legal affairs and representing its interests in safeguarding the fiscal health of the City and the assets of the City's five public pension systems. Ms. Alsina previously served as Senior Policy Advisor to Congresswoman Nydia M. Velázquez in Washington, D.C. Prior to that role, she was the Counsel to the New York City Bar Association where she provided legal advice on a broad range of matters. Ms. Alisna also previously counseled on a variety of legal matters at Municipal Credit Union. Ms. Alsina received a J.D. from Fordham University School of Law and a B.A. and B.S. from Rutgers University.

Accolades submitted by current and former supervisors tempers the penalty recommended be imposed on a correction officer found guilty of using excessive force against an inmate

OATH Administrative Law Judge Ingrid M. Addison recommended a 60-day suspension without pay for a Department of Correction correction officer [CO] found guilty of disciplinary charges involving the use of excessive force against an inmate whom CO struck in the face and head on multiple occasions, submitting a false and misleading use of force report regarding the incident, and having another officer who was not his supervisor complete his report.

Judge Addison found the CO’s defense that he felt himself in imminent danger of serious bodily injury to be incredible, making his use of deadly force unjustified. The ALJ also found that CO mischaracterized the inmate’s posture in his report and at his interview, in an attempt to justify his own reaction.

ALJ Addison, however, recommended that CO be suspended for 60 days without pay in lieu of termination because of numerous accolades from current and former supervisors at the Department as well as from his former supervising Coast Guard official, suggesting that CO's behavior in this case was a significant departure from his norm.

Click HERE to access Judge Addison findings and recommendation.

       __________________

A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances- The text of this publication focuses on determining an appropriate disciplinary penalty to be imposed on an employee in the public service in instances where the employee has been found guilty of misconduct or incompetence. For more information click HERE.

 

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the decisions summarized here. Accordingly, these summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law Blog Editor Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; and Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
Copyright 2009-2024 - Public Employment Law Press. Email: nyppl@nycap.rr.com.