Prima facie case of unlawful discrimination may be rebutted by a presentation of a non-discriminatory reason for the employment decision
Matter of Monsay v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2010 NY Slip Op 06928, Decided on October 1, 2010, Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Evelyn H. Monsay filed charges against the State University College at Oswego with the New York State Division of Human Rights alleging unlawful discrimination based on age and gender.
The Division found that Oswego had not unlawfully discriminate against Monsay on the basis of gender or age and dismissed her complaint.
Monsay appealed but the Appellate Division sustained the Division’s determination, hold that it was supported by substantial evidence.
The court then observed that “Even assuming, arguendo, that [Monsay] established a prima facie case of gender or age discrimination, we conclude that the College rebutted the presumption of discrimination created by [Monsay’s] by presenting the requisite "legitimate, independent, and nondiscriminatory reasons to support its employment decision[s."
It should be noted that once a prima facie case of alleged unlawful discrimination is rebutted by the employer with “legitimate, independent and nondiscriminatory reasons” for its decision, the burden of going forward shifted to Monsay to demonstrate that the explanation offered by Oswego was mere subterfuge for its unlawful discriminatory actions. Apparently Monsay was unable to do so to the satisfaction of the Division of Human Rights.
The decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2010/2010_06928.htm
NYPPL