ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN PREPARING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS

May 11, 2018

Applying of the "Continuing Wrong Doctrine"


Applying of the "Continuing Wrong Doctrine"
Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,380

The Commissioner denied a petition seeking the removal of a member of the Board of Education of the Brentwood Union Free School District, citing a number of procedural defects with respect to the Petitioner's submitting the appeal.

Among the issues addressed by the Commissioner was Petitioner's argument that the petition was timely under the "continuing wrong doctrine."

The Commissioner disagreed, explaining that the continuing wrong doctrine applies when the ongoing action is itself an unlawful action that results in a continuous violation of the law, such as:

a. The unlawful employment of an unqualified individual, [Appeal of Kippen, 48 Ed Dept Rep 469, Decision No. 15,919];

b. The unlawful appointments to a district’s shared decision-making team, [Appeal of Sadue-Sokolow, 39 Ed Dept Rep 6, Decision No. 14,155];

c. An improperly constituted professional development team, [Appeal of Copenhagen Teachers’ Association, et al., 45 Ed Dept Rep 459, Decision No. 15,381]; and

d. Ongoing expenditures under an austerity budget that did not comply with the law, [Appeal of Aarseth, 32 Ed Dept Rep 506, Decision No. 12,901]. 

In contrast, the Commissioner observed that the doctrine "does not apply where the specific action being challenged is a single discrete action, inaction or decision and the resulting effects are continuing but are not intrinsically unlawful."

Addressing an administrative matter, the Commissioner granted the school board member's request for "a certificate of good faith pursuant to Education Law §3811(1) "solely for the purpose of authorizing the board to indemnify her for legal fees and expenses incurred in defending a proceeding arising out of the exercise of her powers or performance of duties as a board member."

The Commissioner explained that it is appropriate to issue such certification unless it is established on the record that the requesting board member or trustee acted in bad faith. In this instance, said the Commissioner, "because the application has been denied on procedural grounds, I hereby certify for the purpose of Education Law §3811(1) that respondent is entitled to receive the requested certificate."

The decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://www.counsel.nysed.gov/Decisions/volume57/d17380

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
NYPPL Blogger Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; and Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com