ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN PREPARING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS

January 21, 2025

Claimant, who suffered suffered from posttraumatic stress disorder as a result of being orally threatened denied Workers' Compensation benefits

Claimant, an applicant for Workers' Compensation Benefits, was operating a bus that was stopped at a red light when a man pounded on the door and demanded to be let onto the bus. When Claimant refused to open the door, the man climbed onto the front bumper of the bus, banged on the glass, bent a wiper blade and, after unsuccessfully attempting to reach in through a side window, broke a side mirror.

Claimant testified that the man orally threatened her, but she managed to close the window before he could reach inside. 

The employer's representative testified that encountering irate bus passengers was not uncommon and that, although most people simply "curse at the driver" and walk away, some do become sufficiently irritated to punch or kick the bus. 

In its decision, the Workers' Compensation Board [Board] found that "the job responsibilities of a bus operator necessarily involve interacting with the general public ..., including unruly ones," and that "it is expected that bus operators could be exposed to unruly individuals and property damage to the vehicle."

The Appellate Division said it "recognize that the record on appeal could also support a contrary conclusion". However, "we do not second-guess the Board's factual determination that this type of incident is one that, as a bus operator, 'claimant should reasonably and ordinarily be expected to encounter in [her] normal work environment,' as it is supported by substantial evidence in the record". Consequently, the court opined it "[found] no reason to disturb the Board's decision."

Justice Lynch, respectfully dissenting, said that in his view "the incident as described by the majority should not in any civilized society be deemed part of 'the normal work environment' of a transit bus operator. There is nothing 'normal' about being victimized by such dangerous conduct. Since it is undisputed that claimant suffered from posttraumatic stress disorder as a result, the Board erred in disallowing her claim."

Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet.


CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
NYPPL Blogger Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard [See also https://www.linkedin.com/in/harvey-randall-9130a5178/]. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com