ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN PREPARING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS

April 12, 2023

Appeal pursuant to New York State's Dignity for All Students Act submitted to the Commissioner of Education

New York State's Dignity for All Students Act* [DASA] prohibits harassment and bullying in public schools.  DASA defines “harassment” and “bullying,” in relevant part, as: “the creation of a hostile environment by conduct or by threats, intimidation or abuse, including cyberbullying ....”.  

Such a hostile environment may be created where bullying or harassment:

(a) has or would have the effect of unreasonably and substantially interfering with a student's educational performance, opportunities or benefits, or mental, emotional or physical well-being; or

(b) reasonably causes or would reasonably be expected to cause a student to fear for his or her physical safety; or

(c) reasonably causes or would reasonably be expected to cause physical injury or emotional harm to a student ....

Citing Appeal of a Student with a Disability, 59 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,859 and Appeal of L.D., 55 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 16,864, the Commissioner of Education observed that a School District’s DASA determination will be reversed "only upon a showing that it was arbitrary or capricious."

Explaining that the petitioner has the burden of demonstrating a clear legal right to the relief requested and the burden of establishing the facts upon which he or she seeks relief, in the instant mater the Commissioner found:

1. The record demonstrated that the School District responded to Petitioner’s allegations of bullying and harassment of Petitioner’s child [Student] appropriately; 

2. The school principal investigated each of the alleged incidents and addressed the alleged misconduct of "A" and "B" promptly;

3. The School District took remedial action to protect Student in school and prevent future bullying or harassment, including the implementation of a “stay away” agreement between Student and "A"; and

4. The principal explained the inappropriateness of "B" addressing derogatory language to Student, and "B" subsequently apologized to Student.

Finding that Petitioner failed to meet her burden of proving that [1] the School District acted in an arbitrary and, or, a capricious manner or [2] that any other relief was warranted, the Commissioner dismissed Petitioner's appeal. 

* Education Law §11[7]; 8 NYCRR 100.2 [kk] [1]

Click HERE to access the Commissioner's decision.

 

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
NYPPL Blogger Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; and Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com