ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN PREPARING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS

January 13, 2015

Accessing personal social medial during working hours


Accessing personal social medial during working hours
Matter of Brookville Ctr. for Children's Servs., Inc.--Commissioner of Labor), 2014 NY Slip Op 08703, Appellate Division, Third Department

An employee [Claimant] was terminated when ran foul of the employer's written policy prohibiting employees from posting on social media "during work hours, unless for specific and approved business purposes."

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board thereafter determined that the Claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits because, in its view, she had not lost her job due to disqualifying misconduct. The employer appeal the Board’s ruling.

The Appellate Division said that the question of whether a claimant engaged in actions sufficient to disqualify him or her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits is a factual one for the Board to resolve, "and its determination will not be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence."

Explaining that “not every discharge for cause rises to the level of misconduct”, which is defined as "a willful and wanton disregard of the employer's interest, the court noted that Claimant did not dispute that she was aware of the employer's policy on social media usage and that she nevertheless posted an item during work hours. The Appellate Division also noted that the record showed that this misconduct was an isolated incident and that Claimant, who had worked for the employer for more than six years, had a clean disciplinary record prior to her termination.

The court ruled that “Substantial evidence thus supports the determination of the Board that [Claimant’s] behavior, while reflective of a momentary lapse in judgment, did not rise to the level of disqualifying misconduct.”

The decision is posted on the Internet at:

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
NYPPL Blogger Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; and Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com