ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN PREPARING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS

March 09, 2016

Employee has the burden of proving alleged misconduct by the arbitrator prejudiced his or her rights or the integrity of the process


Employee has the burden of proving alleged misconduct by the arbitrator prejudiced his or her rights or the integrity of the process
Collazo v Suffolk County, 2016 NY Slip Op 01321, Appellate Division, Second Department

Maria Callazo initiated an Article 75 CPLR proceeding in Supreme Court seeking to vacate an arbitration award that recommended certain disciplinary action be taken against her with respect to her employment with the County. The Appellate Division affirmed Supreme Court’s dismissal of Callazo’s petition.

Contrary to the Callazo's contention, the Appellate Division said that Supreme Court correctly determined that Callazo “failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that any misconduct on the part of the arbitrator prejudiced her rights or the integrity of the arbitration process.” In addition, the Appellate Division noted that the disciplinary charges filed against her were timely served within 18 months of her alleged misconduct in connection with her employment.

The decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_01321.htm
 _______________________________


The Discipline Book - A 458 page guide focusing on New York State laws, rules, regulations, disciplinary grievances procedures set out in collective bargaining agreements and selected court and administrative decisions concerning disciplinary actions involving state and municipal public officers and employees. For more information click on http://booklocker.com/5215.html 
_______________________________


CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
NYPPL Blogger Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; and Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com