ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN THE SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS PREPARED BY NYPPL

September 07, 2016

Educator terminated for doing exactly what he was permitted and encouraged to do by his employer

 
Educator terminated for doing exactly what he was permitted and encouraged to do by his employer
2016 NY Slip Op 51252(U), Supreme Court, New York County, Schlesinger, J.

Petitioner, a former tenured New York City high school teacher, commenced an Article 78 proceeding to challenge his termination by the New York City Department of Education of the City of New York following a multi-day hearing for an alleged “inappropriate" relationship with a certain student.

In the words of Supreme Court Justice Alice Schlesinger:

“This is an unfortunate and unique case, in that petitioner was ultimately terminated for doing exactly what he was permitted and encouraged to do by his employer, and for doing exactly what made him such a fine teacher. For the reasons set forth below, the respondents' cross- motion to dismiss is denied, and the [educator’s] petition is granted.

“The penalty of termination, which certainly shocks this court's conscience,* must be vacated. Furthermore, petitioner, upon his reinstatement, hopefully will feel free to continue teaching in the open, caring and dedicated style he succeeded in and was trained in by his employer, and for which he was rightfully commended and promoted. The record shows that petitioner has always been an excellent teacher and mentor. He should be allowed to continue.”

* See Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222

Attorney for Petitioner: Julia R. Cohen, Esq.; Shebitz Berman Cohen and Delforte PC
Attorney for Employer: Gabriel Gladstone, Esq.; Off. of the New York City Corporation Counsel

The decision is posted on the Internet at:

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the decisions summarized here. Accordingly, these summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law Blog Editor Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; and Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
Copyright 2009-2024 - Public Employment Law Press. Email: n467fl@gmail.com