ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED IN COMPOSING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS.

Jul 22, 2026

Employee's absence from work due being convicted and sentenced to two years in prison deemed to have impeded the Employer’s ability to fulfill its mission

New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings Administrative Law Judge [ALJ], Jonathan Fogel, recommended termination of the employment of a sanitation worker [Employee] who was absent without leave [“AWOL”] for approximately ten months. 

While employed by the New York City Department of Sanitation [Agency], Employee was convicted of assault in the second degree and sentenced to two years in prison. His "Employee's absence from work due being convicted and sentenced to two years in prison was deemed to have impeded the Employer’s ability to fulfill its mission as the result of his incarceration.

The Employee attempted to have the Agency's administrative disciplinary charge dismissed for improper service because he was not personally served while in prison. Judge Fogel, however, found that the method of service used by the Agency - mailing the disciplinary charge to the Employee by certified mail via the United States Postal Service addressed to the Employee where Employee was incarcerated - satisfied due process requirements.

There was no dispute that Employee had been absent from work since February 2025 and the ALJ found that Agency had proven the charge. Although Employee had made an effort to retain his job by applying for a leave of absence, Judge Fogel found that the Employee’s continued absence impeded the Agency’s ability to fulfill its mission and recommended the Employee be terminated from his position.

Click HERE to access ALJ Fogel's findings and recommended penalty posted on the Internet.


Editor in Chief Harvey Randall served as Director of Personnel, State University of New York Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor's Office of Employee Relations; Principal Attorney, Counsel's Office, New York State Department of Civil Service; and Colonel, JAG, Command Headquarters, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com