ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN PREPARING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS

September 10, 2020

Filing a demand for arbitration of a dispute held controlled by the terms and conditions set out in the relevant collective bargaining agreement

One of the issues presented in this appeal concerned a demand for arbitration by the aggrieved party [Petitioner] in response to a claim seeking the payment of a $1,111,124 "withdrawal liability" following Petitioner's withdrawal from a pension fund.

The relevant collective bargaining agreement provided that any arbitration would be filed with and therefore governed by the American Arbitration Association's [AAA] rules, which rules, as relevant here, required Petitioner to file a timely demand for arbitration and to submit the required AAA filing fee* in order to initiate the arbitration process.

Petitioner contended that the district court erred in granting summary judgment against it, arguing that:

[1] It had made a timely demanded for arbitration of the issue; and

[2] Any failure to make a timely demand was excused because the arbitration rules of the AAA "imposed preconditions to arbitration that were not fair or equitable."

Rejecting the claims advanced by the Petitioner, the Circuit Court concluded that the Petitioner was bound by the AAA's rules, which required Petitioner to initiate arbitration with the AAA by filing a timely formal demand for arbitration and submitting the required filing fee, and found that the Petitioner had not done so.

Accordingly, Circuit Court of Appeals affirm the federal district court’s judgment.

* In this instance the AAA filing fee was $8,200.

'The decision is posted on the Internet at: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/19-1093/19-1093-2020-09-03.html

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
NYPPL Blogger Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; and Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com