ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED IN COMPOSING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS.

Aug 6, 2026

New York State Department of Civil Service issue Attendance and Leave Memoranda updates

The New York State Department of Civil Service has published Attendance and Leave Memoranda for certain holiday available to State Officers and Employees on August 6, 2026,:

  • Advisory Memorandum 2026-04 - Designation of Floating Holidays in Lieu of Election Day and Lincoln's Birthday for Contract Year 2026–2027

and

  • Transmittal Memorandum No. 52 - 2027 Calendar of Legal Holidays and Days of Religious Significance

The Text of Advisory Memorandum 2026-04 will be found by clicking:
Advisory Memorandum 2026-04

If you wish to print Advisory Memorandum 2026-04; a version in PDF format is available at Advisory Memorandum 2026-04 PDF

The Text of Transmittal Memorandum No. 52 will be found by clicking 
Transmittal Memorandum No. 52

If you wish to print Transmittal Memorandum No. 52 a version in PDF format is available at Transmittal Memorandum No. 52 PDF

To view previous Attendance and Leave bulletins issued by the New York State Department of Civil Service, visit: https://www.cs.ny.gov/attendance_leave/index.cfm


Governor Kathy Hochol announces the ratification of five-year labor agreements with four CSEA collective bargaining units

 

On August 8, 2026, Governor Kathy Hochul announced the ratification of five-year labor agreements with each of the four bargaining units represented by the Civil Service Employees Association (CSEA). In total, CSEA represents more than 55,000 New York State employees in a wide variety of roles. The agreements run from April 2, 2026 until April 1, 2031. Each agreement was overwhelmingly approved by CSEA members.

 

“Every day, dedicated CSEA members perform essential work to keep New York moving, and these agreements recognize those efforts while also serving as a fair deal for New York’s taxpayers,” Governor Hochul said. “Our valued public servants are the backbone of a strong Empire State, and I thank the members and leadership of CSEA for their dedication in continuing to help and serve their fellow New Yorkers.”

 

CSEA President Mary E. Sullivan said, “I thank Governor Hochul for working with CSEA to reach an agreement that reflects the value of our members and the vital services they provide. Every day, more than 55,000 CSEA members keep our roads safe, care for our most vulnerable neighbors, maintain our parks and campuses, protect our communities and deliver the public services New Yorkers depend on. This contract is an investment in them and in the future of our state.”

 

The ratified contracts each include the following raises across the five years of the agreement: 4.5 percent, 4 percent, 3.5 percent, 3 percent, and 3 percent. Boosts to location pay and several other unit-specific payments are also included in the contracts. Members also will gain 20 hours of paid pre-natal leave and an increase in the cap for sick leave accumulation. The agreements also include reasonable updates to health insurance that will reduce costs for members by eliminating certain co-pays and providing incentives to use in-network providers.

 

###


New York Health Policy Monitor


Aug 5, 2026

Executive Order No. 62: Establishing a Temporary Moratorium on Data Centers in New York while the State Develops Higher Standards for Data Center Development and Benefits Blueprint to Support Localities

WHEREAS, New York State (the State) is experiencing unprecedented growth in demand for data center development, driven by the need for computing infrastructure that supports artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing, streaming services, and other computing operations; and 

WHEREAS, the increasing demand for data storage and processing capacities, especially for intensive computational tasks, has led to multiple proposals for the construction and operation of data centers that require large amounts of energy and water to run and cool thousands of computer servers; and 

WHEREAS, as of May 2026, nearly 12 gigawatts (12,000 megawatts) of data center load requests are in the New York Independent System Operator interconnection queue with more than eight gigawatts entering the queue in 2025 alone, representing accelerating demand growth and a need for action; and 

WHEREAS, Energize NY Development, announced in the 2026 State of the State, directs the Public Service Commission to modernize how large energy consumers, including data centers, connect to the grid, while ensuring those consumers pay their fair share or supply their own power; and 

WHEREAS, it is the policy of New York State that the cost of electric system upgrades required to provide electric utility service to large loads should not be paid for by every-day New Yorkers; and 

WHEREAS, the growth of Statewide electric load caused by data centers challenges the clean energy targets of the State and will require the procurement of additional energy supply to serve this incremental electric load; and 

WHEREAS, data center development can be unpredictable and creates potential risk for utilities and ratepayers, including when infrastructure investments are made in anticipation of loads that may not fully materialize; and 

WHEREAS, the State is dedicated to environmental quality, sound public health and safety, economic prosperity, and social well-being; and 

WHEREAS, New Yorkers have expressed legitimate concerns regarding the potential impacts of the siting and operation of data centers on energy use, water use, water quality, air quality, noise, lighting, quality of life, and other potential environmental impacts; and 

WHEREAS, the State’s existing regulatory frameworks are not yet prepared to address the large-scale water use and treatment from data centers which could strain aquifers, surface waters, and public infrastructure; and 

WHEREAS, as competition for clean freshwater resources increases due to threats to water quality and changing precipitation and drought patterns from climate change, the need to maximize water reuse and implement the best available technologies to conserve water resources becomes increasingly important, especially within sectors of highwater-demand such as data centers; and 

WHEREAS, without regulations, policies, or guidance that enable safe, efficient, and economically viable water use and reuse, the State risks exacerbating water scarcity conditions in high-demand areas, constraining industrial growth, and undermining long-term climate resilience; and 

WHEREAS, localities across New York are increasingly contending with the costs and benefits of serving as host communities for data centers, and hosting a data center presents unique opportunities for the host community to encourage and secure private sector investment from the developer or operator that delivers meaningful local benefits; and 

WHEREAS, while the negotiation of local benefits with data center developers or operators is the responsibility of the locality, the State can offer valuable technical resources and provide best practices to support the negotiation of meaningful local commitments from the developer or operator; 

NOW, THEREFORE I, Kathy Hochul, Governor of the State of New York, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and Laws of the State of New York, do hereby order as follows: 

1. Data Center Permitting Moratorium and Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) The Department of Public Service (DPS) is directed to examine the impacts associated with the interconnection of data centers to the electric distribution network through its proceeding under Case 26-E0045, Proceeding on Motion of the Commission to Address Interconnection Reforms for Large Loads. 

In connection with such proceeding, DPS is further directed to initiate a formal public process, including public comment and a public hearing, to create a Generic Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with the requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act at Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, SEQRA), to assess the potential environmental impacts of the construction and operation of data centers in the State, including energy demand, water use and quality, air quality, disproportionate impacts on disadvantaged communities, and noise levels. DPS shall submit a report of such Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement and findings statement. DPS shall consult with the Department of Environmental Conservation and other relevant state agencies and authorities. 

Until DPS submits its report of the final Generic Environmental Impact Statement and associated findings statement, the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), consistent with its obligations under SEQRA, is directed to hold in abeyance all applications for any discretionary permit, approval, license, or similar form of permission for the construction or expansion of a data center that (1) are or may hereafter be pending before DEC and (2) have not been determined to be complete by DEC before the date of this Executive Order. As a condition precedent to a determination of completeness for an application for a discretionary permit, approval, license, or similar form of permission, DEC may require the applicant to identify and describe in writing whether such application relates to or involves the construction or operation of a data center. 

This provision does not apply to permits, approvals, licenses, or similar forms of permission from local governments. DEC shall assist DPS in the preparation of the Generic Environmental Impact Statement referenced above. 

2. Developing a Community Investment Framework To assist localities across New York in analyzing and attaining local economic benefits and mitigating potential negative effects of serving as a host community for a data center, Empire State Development (ESD) is directed, within 60 days of this Executive Order, to consider feedback on and create and post on its website a Community Investment Framework. 87 ESD shall include in such Community Investment Framework, guidance associated with: 

a. Creation and maintenance of a community investment fund into which data center developers or operators provide capital that can be used for energy affordability efforts and enhancements to public services such as child care, K-12 programming, or public infrastructure. 

b. Investments in local infrastructure such as local energy distribution systems, broadband or irrigation systems or wastewater treatment plants 

c. Establishment of frameworks that provide organized labor a seat at the table and prioritize prevailing wage standards and project labor agreements for data center construction, local hiring, apprenticeships and workforce development to maximize economic benefits. 

d. Transparency through reporting requirements or other means so that communities understand many of the key economic metrics associated with data center development. Localities and other governmental entities, including but not limited to Industrial Development Agencies, may use the Community Investment Framework to negotiate terms and conditions with the developer or operator of such data center, to help the host community explore ways it can directly benefit from such project through established partnerships, direct investments in the community, and any other appropriate terms. 

3. The New York Grid Acceleration Fund DPS is also directed to consider the development of a mechanism to protect all customers from the risk of significant costs and risks of stranded assets, including consideration of a New York Grid Acceleration Fund, and may consider such as part of the Energize NY Proceeding. The Fund may require data centers to make upfront capital contributions to finance grid improvements, participate in demand response programs, support the procurement of new clean energy supply including distributed energy resources, and establish an insurance pool to which developers may need to contribute. This Fund would help ensure that New York’s grid is modernized to maintain reliability while also ensuring the costs of integrating and serving these new loads are not borne by other ratepayers. 

The Fund could also explore options to support energy affordability. DPS shall consider assessing how data center contributions to the Fund may be structured, including contribution levels and how funds may be allocated. Additionally, the department shall consider developing a process to work with utilities and other stakeholders to identify necessary infrastructure improvements across the grid. 

A component of the Fund may include measures to protect ratepayers from project delays, changes in scope, or cancellations that could result in stranded assets. As part of this effort, DPS may evaluate approaches to require data centers to fund new clean electric generation and/or battery storage dedicated to their operations, consistent with the State’s clean energy goals, including customer-sited distributed energy resources, to the greatest extent feasible. 

4. Interconnection, Reliability, and Cost Allocation DPS is directed within sixty days to form a Data Center Interconnection Working Group to identify and resolve issues related to the interconnection of data centers, and other large loads, in order to support efficient interconnection of large new customers and the faithful compliance of “beneficiary pays” principles as related to network upgrade and resource adequacy costs. DPS is directed to convene the State’s transmission owners to review their practices and methodologies for studying the system impacts of data centers, and other large loads in order to understand their sufficiency for the purpose of estimating and managing cost impacts, both as they relate to network upgrades and to supply. DPS is directed to report to the Commission within ninety days. Data centers may also be subject to service classifications and requirements pertaining to data centers to be developed by DPS and as may be established by the Public Service Commission in the exercise of its discretion. 

5. Data Center Water Withdrawal Review and Report DEC shall assess whether any new or amended regulations, policies, reporting, or guidance is necessary or appropriate to help ensure its water withdrawal program requirements, pursuant to 6 NYCRR Parts 601 and 602, accurately and completely reflect the water demands of large use customers in the State, including data centers. 

No later than twelve months after the date of this order, DEC shall deliver a report setting forth the results of such assessment and an identification of the potential regulatory, policy, and guidance actions that are necessary or appropriate to address the concerns associated with the siting and operation of data centers in the State. 

6. Definition For the purposes of this Executive Order, “data center” shall mean a facility or group of facilities located on the same site or contiguous sites used to house computer servers, associated components, or computing or telecommunications equipment for the storage, processing, distribution, and / or management of data. Characteristics of data centers subject to this Executive Order include computer servers, associated components, or computing or telecommunications equipment which: (1) are in facilities containing uninterruptible power supply systems, specialized cooling systems designed for high-density computing loads, and / or contain cybersecurity systems designed for secure digital infrastructure operations, (2) provide data storage, cloud computing, and/or content delivery to customers, internal operations, and/or affiliated business operations, oftentimes on a continuous twenty-four-hour cycle, and (3) consume or can consume 50 megawatts of energy or more. 

Provided, however, that a facility that is primarily used for manufacturing, research (including but not limited to quantum computing research or biomedical research), education (including but not limited to such facilities used by accredited colleges and universities in New York State, to the extent such colleges and universities are engaging in academic research, and the Empire AI consortium, or the institute, as defined in section three hundred sixty-one of the Economic Development Law), or the provision of medical care, is not covered by this definition and thus not subject to this Executive Order. 

7. Agency Consultation In implementing this order, DEC, DPS, and ESD shall consult with one another and with additional partner agencies and authorities in the State, including but not limited to the Authorities Budget Office, Department of Health, the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, the Long Island Power Authority, the Department of State, as well as the New York Independent System Operator. (L.S.) 

GIVEN under my hand and the Privy Seal of the State in the City of Albany this fourteenth day of July in the year two thousand twenty-six. 

BY THE GOVERNOR /S/ Kathy Hochul 

/s/ Karen Persichilli Keogh Secretary to the Governor 

Executive Orders NYS Register/August 5, 2026 



Administrative Law Judge recommended a 60-Day suspension without pay after finding supervisor sexually harassed a coworker while both were on duty

In this New York State Civil Service Law Section 75 disciplinary action New York  City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearing [OATH] Administrative Law Judge [ALJ] Christine Stecura found a Supervisor guilty of disciplinary charges alleging Supervisor had sexually harassed a coworker while on duty and recommended that the appointing authority [Petitioner] impose a 60-day suspension without pay on the Supervisor as the  appropriate penalty under the circumstances.

The Petitioner's disciplinary charges alleged Supervisor of “[e]ngaging in activity that interferes with any activity of the [Department] or those of its officers or employees”, which is “conduct unbecoming a City employee” and “[p]rejudicial to [g]ood [o]rder] and [d]iscipline”.  

ALJ Stecura found that Petitioner had proved the charges served on Supervisor by a preponderance of the credible evidence. 

Credible evidence has been defined as “the burden of persuading the triers of fact that the existence of the fact is more probable than its non-existence.” 

Click HERE to access Judge Stecura's decision posted on the Internet.


Aug 4, 2026

School Board's prompt reporting of certain improprieties in the school district's 2026 election results in immediate corrective action

The School Board [Board] in this appeal to New York State's Commission of Education, the Board asked the Commissioner to annul her May 19, 2026 order pursuant to Education Law §2037 annulling the results of the School District's May 19, 2026 election. 

The Board had reported a number of improprieties in connection with the May 2026 including the Board's discovery of a garbage bag containing “folded ballots” and “ripped up cast ballots” in a dumpster outside of the district’s administrative office. 
The Board also noted that:
(1) the district clerk did not, as required by statute,[1] create a list of absentee/early mail voters; 
(2) there were numerous discrepancies regarding absentee ballots; and 
(3) certain ballots for voters “unable to appear personally at the polling place because of illness or physical disability”[2] were mailed beyond the statutory deadline.
The Commissioner noted that in order to invalidate the results of a school district election, the petitioner must either:
(1) establish not only that irregularities occurred but also that any irregularities actually affected the outcome of the election or were so pervasive that they vitiated the electoral process; or 
(2) demonstrate a clear and convincing picture of informality to the point of laxity in adherence to the Education Law.
The Commissioner, noting that the Board's above recited evidence amply paints a “clear and convincing picture of informality” that warrants a new election, said that such relief was awarded in an interim order dated June 25, 2026.
Further, the Commissioner noted that the appointment of the District Superintendent for the Putnam Northern Westchester Board of Cooperative Services to fulfill the role of district clerk and indicated that "the June 25, 2026 order continues to represent appropriate relief for the violations of law and irregularities described in the [Board's] petition" and that her "interim order remains in effect without modification".
Footnotes:
[1] Education Law §§ 2018-b (7), 2018-f (7).  See Appeal of Touré, et al., 54 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 16,660 (the “failure to maintain ... a list [of absentee voters] is an open invitation to fraud and threatens the integrity of the electoral process”). 
[2] Education Law § 2018-a (2) (a) (2).
Click HERE to access the Commissioner's decision posted on the Internet.

Aug 3, 2026

New York State Bar Association's Labor and Employment Law Section's 2026 meeting

Join/Renew
Labor and Employment Law Section 2026 Fall Meeting
Important notes:
1) The hotel is selling out quickly - book your hotel room now.
2) Labor and Employment Law Section Members: should register now to save $50 off the registration fee. This early bird savings expires on Aug. 14, 2026.
Friday, October 2, 2026 – Sunday, October 4, 2026
The Statler Hotel at Cornell University – Ithaca, NY
Register Now
Book Hotel
Editor in Chief Harvey Randall served as Director of Personnel, State University of New York Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor's Office of Employee Relations; Principal Attorney, Counsel's Office, New York State Department of Civil Service; and Colonel, JAG, Command Headquarters, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com