TO SEARCH THIS DATABASE type in a word or phrase in the box in the upper left corner and any material containing the word or phrase will be displayed for your review.
N.B. §22 of the New York State General Construction Law, in pertinent part, provides that “Whenever words of the masculine or feminine gender appear in any law, rule or regulation, unless the sense of the sentence indicates otherwise, they shall be deemed to refer to both male or female persons.” NYPPL follows this protocol.
January 31, 2019
Retaliation against an employee for reporting improper governmental action prohibited by Civil Service Law §75-b, the "Whistleblower Statute"
January 30, 2019
Failure to effect proper service of all of the necessary documents as mandated by law is fatal to a court attaining jurisdiction over the state parties in the action
January 29, 2019
Proof an individual must submit to a court to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract and an alleged tortious interference with prospective economic advantage
January 28, 2019
Elements considered by courts in reviewing an individual's appeal of an adverse disciplinary decision by an appointing authority
In an employee disciplinary matter conducted pursuant to §75 of the Civil Service Law, judicial review of factual findings made after a hearing is limited to consideration of whether that determination was supported by substantial evidence. Further, in the event there is conflicting evidence, or different inferences that may be drawn from the evidence, the duty of weighing the evidence and making the choice rests solely upon the appointing authority and courts may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by the appointing authority where the evidence is conflicting and room for choice exists.
The Appellate Division decided that the penalty imposed on Thomas' by the appointing authority, dismissal from his employment, "is not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, especially in light of the number of incidents and the petitioner's prior disciplinary record."
January 26, 2019
January 25, 2019
January 24, 2019
Documents containing information used to evaluate the performance of specified public employees are not subject to disclosure pursuant to a Freedom of Information request
January 23, 2019
January 22, 2019
January 18, 2019
How Lawyers Are Using Social Media in 2019
January 17, 2019
Doe, however, subsequently repudiated the settlement, stating that the oral contract was not binding and she had been under duress.
In order to determine if the parties intended to be bound by an oral contract, the courts consider four elements:
NEW YORK PUBLIC PERSONNEL LAW ELECTRONIC HANDBOOKS
Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from The Discipline Book concerning the due process rights of public employees in
Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances applied to public employees in
Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual.
Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from Disability Benefits for fire, police and other public sector personnel.
Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the decisions summarized here. Accordingly, these summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, REMEMBER THAT CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG.
THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
N.B. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material in this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor members of the staff are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is advised to seek such advice from a competent professional.