TO SEARCH THIS DATABASE type in a word or phrase in the box in the upper left corner and any material containing the word or phrase will be displayed for your review.
N.B. §22 of the New York State General Construction Law, in pertinent part, provides that “Whenever words of the masculine or feminine gender appear in any law, rule or regulation, unless the sense of the sentence indicates otherwise, they shall be deemed to refer to both male or female persons.” NYPPL follows this protocol.
March 30, 2019
March 29, 2019
March 28, 2019
Excessed educator claims back pay, benefits and pension credit based on the appointing authority's alleged failure to reinstate her from the preferred eligible list
The issue before the Commissioner concerned Appellant's assertion that Employer:
** It should be noted that a preferred list for a particular title or position is a "moving target" as names are added to it to reflect the reinstatement rights of individuals excessed as the result of subsequent layoffs. Preferred eligible lists are revised to reflect "seniority rank order" of individuals added to, or deleted from, the list over time.
March 27, 2019
The continuing violation exception when filing of a complaint alleging a violation of New York State's Human Rights Law is not triggered by a single event
March 26, 2019
Judicial review of student disciplinary action taken by a private college or university is limited to whether the institution substantially complied with its own rules
March 25, 2019
Upon permanent appointment to a position in the classified service the officer or employee is typically required to serve a specified minimum period of probation, but not to exceed a specified maximum period of probation.
In this action the petitioner [Probationer] was permanently appointed to his position effective
March 23, 2019
March 22, 2019
Unemployment insurance benefits unavailable to claimant found to have engaged in disqualifying misconduct
An individual [Claimant] employed by a municipality was alleged to have committed numerous violations of her employer's code of conduct by, among other things, failing to report to work on time, being absent without authorization, sleeping and lounging during her shift and refusing to comply with her supervisor's directives.
The employer placed Claimant on a 30-day suspension without pay and served Claimant with disciplinary charges pursuant to Civil Service Law §75. The penalty proposed by the employer: Termination.
March 21, 2019
Disregarding unrebutted medical evidence in the record supporting an application for accidental disability retirement benefits fatal to the Medical Board and the Board of Trustees rejecting the application
March 20, 2019
Individuals serving a public entity as independent contractors are not eligible for member service credit in a New York State public retirement system
*** For additional information concerning the legal status of independent contractors go to:
March 19, 2019
Procedures required to be followed by an appointing authority seeking to place an employee on disability leave pursuant to Civil Service Law §72 involuntarily
** The final determination of the civil service commission is binding on both the employee and the appointing authority. Either party, or both, however, may seek review of a final determination of a commission in accordance with the provisions of Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules.
*** Leave pursuant to §72 is "leave without pay" although an individual on such leave may elect use his or her "accrued leave credits" and other available leave credits until all such leave credits are exhausted in order to remain on the payroll. Further, in addition to involuntarily being placed on §72 leave by the appointing authority, when such an action is not initiated by the appointing authority an employee may request to placed on such leave, the approval of such a request to be granted at the discretion of the appointing authority.
The decision is posted on the Internet at:
March 18, 2019
An employee serving a probationary period bears the burden of establishing that his or her "dismissal was due to causes unrelated to work performance and/or improperly motivated"
March 15, 2019
Principles governing judicial review of administrative determinations pursuant to the substantial evidence standard
The ALJ conducted two hearings and issued a recommended decision finding that Justice had established by a preponderance of the evidence that Petitioner was guilty of the alleged adverse conduct involving the Service Recipient. A final determination and order was issued adopting the ALJ's recommended decision. The decision denied Petitioner's request to amend and seal the report and directed that Petitioner be permanently placed on the agency's Vulnerable Person's Central Register staff exclusion list. Based on this determination, the New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services [OASAS] revoked Petitioner's license.
Petitioner filed a CPLR Article 78 proceeding in Supreme Court contending the determination was not supported by substantial evidence in the record because it was based upon controverted hearsay evidence. As a question of substantial evidence was raised by Petitioner, the proceeding was transferred to the Appellate Division.
March 14, 2019
PERB has exclusive jurisdiction to resolve a claim that a public employer committed an improper practice by discontinuing a past practice
NEW YORK PUBLIC PERSONNEL LAW ELECTRONIC HANDBOOKS
Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from The Discipline Book concerning the due process rights of public employees in
Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances applied to public employees in
Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual.
Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from Disability Benefits for fire, police and other public sector personnel.
Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the decisions summarized here. Accordingly, these summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, REMEMBER THAT CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG.
THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
N.B. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material in this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor members of the staff are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is advised to seek such advice from a competent professional.