ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED IN COMPOSING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS.

Oct 28, 2026

Governments brace for a "new normal" following PHP cybersecurity scares

On October 28, 2026, Governing Daily posted a report on the Internet indicating that the discovery of two critical flaws in a foundational programming language triggered governments and companies around the world to take down their websites. 

Governing Daily's Internet post said that "state and local leaders are preparing for AI [Artificial Intelligence] to unlock a new world of constant vigilance and heightened cyber risks". 

Click the text in red to Read More


On October 27, 2026, New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli announced the following local government and school audits have been issued.

Click on the Text highlighted in COLOR to access the audit.

Building Access in 20 Schools Auditors conducted 20 school district and boards of cooperative educational services (schools) audits between December 2025 and May 2026 and found that most schools did not properly manage and monitor building access accounts and devices. As a result, there were potential risks for unauthorized access to the schools’ buildings, compromising building security and safety for students, teachers, staff and visitors. Individual reports for each school district were issued, as well as this report summarizing the overall findings. 

Audit Follow-Up Reviews for 20 Fire Districts The State Comptroller’s office previously issued 20 fire district audits and conducted this follow up to determine if the fire district implemented those recommended. Auditors determined that district officials did not fully implement 121 of the 163 recommendations (74%), leaving operations and taxpayer resources vulnerable to inefficiencies and fraud. 

Bloomington Fire District – Transparency of Fiscal Activities (Ulster County) The board did not obtain an audit of the treasurer’s financial records for fiscal year 2025. According to district officials, the last board-obtained audit of the treasurer’s records was for fiscal year 2017. In addition, the treasurer did not prepare and file the 2025 annual financial report (AFR) with the State Comptroller’s office within 60 days after the fiscal year end as required by state law. Prior to this audit, the treasurer last filed the AFR for fiscal year 2017.

Le Roy Fire District – Purchasing: Travel, Meals and Refreshments (Genesee County) The board did not adequately oversee the district’s travel, meal and refreshment purchases to ensure they were properly supported with documentation, complied with district policies and served legitimate district purposes. Of the 134 purchases totaling approximately $23,000 that auditors reviewed, 117 purchases worth $22,100 contained one or more exceptions. As a result, district officials paid approximately $17,000 for purchases that were unnecessary or not appropriate. The purchases accounted for 74% of the travel, meal and refreshments purchases made during the audit.

Palmyra-Macedon Central School District – Information Technology (IT) Asset Management (Ontario County and Wayne County) District officials did not appropriately inventory, track and safeguard IT assets. Because the board of education did not adopt an IT asset inventory policy, district officials lacked detailed guidance for the maintenance of IT asset inventory records. As a result, the director did not maintain complete, accurate and up-to-date inventory records to properly account for IT assets.

Town Line Fire Department – Capital Projects (Erie County) The board and president did not properly plan and manage the capital project. By adopting a written multiyear capital plan, creating a detailed and itemized budget, approving all change orders and adhering to the department’s purchasing policy, they could have gained a clearer understanding of the project’s requirements. This would have allowed for a more accurate cost estimate and timeline, which could have avoided unnecessary costs. Consequently, the treasurer paid approximately $1.6 million in project expenses, which surpassed the initially estimated costs of $1 million.

Village of Moravia – Treasurer’s Records and Reports (Cayuga County) The treasurer did not prepare and maintain complete, accurate and timely records and reports. As a result, the board of trustees did not have reliable financial information to effectively manage the village’s financial operations, which increased the risk that errors, irregularities and misuse of village resources could occur and remain undetected.

Village of Walden – Payroll and Employee Benefits (Orange County) Village officials did not consistently ensure that employee payroll and leave accruals were accurate, properly approved and adequately supported. Weaknesses in payroll oversight and internal controls reduced accountability and transparency, and contributed to at least $144,767 in unsupported payroll payments, leave accruals and employee benefits.

Wayne County Industrial Development Agency (WCIDA) – Website Transparency WCIDA officials generally maintained a transparent website. However, auditors identified minor issues that they reviewed with WCIDA officials.

Ravena-Coeymans-Selkirk Union Free School District – Audit Follow-Up Review (Albany County and Greene County) The purpose of the review was to assess the district’s progress in implementing recommendations in Ravena-Coeymans-Selkrik Central School District – Lead Testing and Reporting, released in July 2025. Of the audit’s seven recommendations, district officials fully implemented three recommendations related to reporting and recordkeeping and partially implemented four recommendations related to sampling, testing, remediation and review of the district’s lead testing program. Until the remaining recommendations are fully implemented, district officials cannot ensure that all applicable water outlets are identified and tested or appropriately secured against use. As a result, students and staff could consume water from outlets that have not been tested and could potentially exceed the lead action level.

###

Oct 27, 2026

On October 28, 2026 join the New York State'S Workers' Compensation Board's presentation of "Workers’ Comp 202 – Best Practices to Access Benefits for Workers"

A presentation by the Office of the Advocate for Injured Workers

The Board is pleased to continue its webinar series tomorrow for workers and their advocates, and there is still time to register!

Workers’ Comp 202 is a deeper dive into best practices workers can use to access their workers’ compensation benefits. This presentation will cover:

  • understanding labor market attachment,
  • details on benefit periods and how benefit rates are calculated,
  • the importance of items such as the degree of disability and the Carrier Continue Payments (CCP) order,
  • how advocates can help workers and comply with privacy provisions,
  • The Board’s New York Medical Treatment Guidelines, and more!

The sessions are free and there will be time for your questions.

Register here

Wednesday, October 28, 2026
12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.

Tuesday, November 24, 2026
12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.

Tuesday, December 22, 2026
12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.

More information

Visit the Advocate for Injured Workers section of the Board’s website for additional resources.

You can also call the Advocate for Injured Workers at (877) 632-4996 or email advinjwkr@wcb.ny.gov.


Having trouble?

If you are having trouble registering for or attending any of these webinars, check out these Webinar FAQs.


Owner of medical transportation company pleads guilty to Medicaid fraud

The owner of an Ulster County medical transportation service company today pleaded guilty to grand larceny in the second degree for stealing $227,000 by unlawfully billing the Medicaid program by inflating charges and billing for services that were never provided, State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli and Ulster County District Attorney Emmanuel C. Nneji announced today.

Mohammad A. Khan, 69, the owner of Atlas Limo pleaded guilty in Ulster County Court before Judge Bryan Rounds and paid $227,000 in restitution. Sentencing was scheduled for Jan. 4, 2027.

“Khan falsified bills and bribed patients to defraud Medicaid, bolstering his own profits at the expense of New Yorkers,” DiNapoli said. “Now, thanks to my partnership with District Attorney Nneji, he is facing the consequences of his actions. Millions rely on Medicaid for their health care needs. I will continue to partner with law enforcement throughout the state to root out fraud and protect the integrity of the program.”

“As we continue to work hand-in-hand with NYS Comptroller Tom DiNapoli to combat fraud in Ulster County, it is both gratifying to hold the principals of the Atlas Limo Corporation accountable and to recoup funds fraudulently obtained by them. I remain committed to rooting out fraud, public and otherwise, because it is not just a matter of accounting for public money, it is also necessary to restore public trust,” Nneji said.

Under the Medicaid program, patients may use transportation services to go to legitimate medical appointments. Providers then bill the Medicaid program. Group rides are not allowed without prior authorization, and approved providers can only bill for mileage once for a group.

As part of the joint investigation, DiNapoli’s investigative team and the Ulster County District Attorney’s Office found that the defendant systematically billed the Medicaid program individually for rides that were actually unauthorized group rides and for rides that never occurred. The investigation also found patients were paid kickbacks to use Atlas Limo’s services and facilitate the fraud. The crimes occurred from May 2024 to January 2025.

Khan was arrested in June 2025 along with his son, Muhammad W. Khan, the owner of MAK Limo. Both companies were enrolled in the Medicaid program.

Muhammad W. Khan pleaded guilty to stealing over $1 million in Medicaid funding. He was ordered to pay full restitution and was sentenced to three to nine years of state prison in September 2026.

DiNapoli has zero tolerance for Medicaid fraud and fraud of any public monies. Over the last 18 months, DiNapoli’s investigations of Medicaid fraud have resulted in 58 arrests and the ordered recovery of nearly $50 million. 

                                                        ###

Since taking office in 2007, DiNapoli has committed to fighting public corruption and encourages the public to help fight fraud and abuse. New Yorkers can report allegations of fraud involving taxpayer money by calling the toll-free Fraud Hotline at 1-888-672-4555: by filing a complaint online at https://www.osc.ny.gov/investigations, or by mailing a complaint to: Office of the State Comptroller, Division of Investigations, 8th Floor, 110 State St., Albany, NY 12236.


Oct 26, 2026

Environmental Claims Journal (ECJ) renamed the JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RISK, IMPACT, AND CLAIMS (JERIC)

Dr. Robert A. Michaels, founder and principal scientist of RAM TRAC Corporation, is a toxicologist specializing in assessment and management of environmental risks potentially posed to human health. 

Michaels recently was appointed Co-Editor-in-Chief (with attorney Mark Heinzelmann) of the recently renamed Environmental Claims Journal.  The name change to JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RISK, IMPACT, AND CLAIMS (JERIC) reflects 38 years of evolution of the journal's unique scope and identity, which is at the intersection of environmental and public health sciences with insurance and legal claims. 

Like all successful journals, JERIC grows and adapts, shaped by emerging science, professional practice, and the perspectives of its editors and contributors. The new name reflects this growth, and the journal’s new forest green cover is more ecological, as recommended by Howard M. Tollin, Esq., JERIC's outgoing Editor-in-Chief of 12 years, and architect of the Journal’s current incarnation. As author of the introductory editorial, Michaels expressed gratitude to attorney Howard Tollin for his long-time leadership and vision, and to publisher Taylor and Francis for its editorship vision, combining the perspectives of a scientist and an attorney. 

The scope of JERIC extends beyond insurance and legal claims. Environmental claims — whether insurance-related, legal, or regulatory — do not arise in isolation. They are the downstream result of a sequence: environmental risks may give rise to impacts, and impacts to claims. The Journal's new title embraces this full continuum, making explicit what long has been implicit in its pages. It invites expanded interest and, hopefully, expanded readership. 

Environmental risks, impacts, and claims may stem from substances or other stressors that typically may be present, or that are introduced into, natural, agricultural, or occupational settings (among others). Such stressors may originate from biological processes, as often is the case in epidemiology, or from agricultural, commercial, or industrial activities. In complex settings, impacts may arise from multiple sources. Accordingly, scientific assessment and apportionment of the sources of risk and impact remain central challenges for resolution of insurance and legal claims. 

Whether naturally occurring or anthropogenic, environmental stressors may pose risks to ecosystems, to public health, and/or to occupationally or socially exposed populations. Risks may materialize as straightforwardly measurable or difficult-to-measure health and/or environmental impacts, documented through qualitative or quantitative environmental, occupational, and health risk assessments. In turn, impacts may generate economic damages, insurance claims, and legal actions, together acting toward determining and apportioning responsibility, allocating liability, securing just compensation, and identifying risk management options. 

By explicitly recognizing risk and impact alongside claims, the Journal affirms its commitment to spanning the full gamut of component environmental issues — from sources and exposures to consequences, accountability, and resolution.  

Accordingly, readers are referred to its updated Aims and Scope statement [https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/becj21/about-this-journal#aims-and-scope]. This broader framing better reflects the multidisciplinary and unique nature of JERIC's scope, and may foster deeper connections between scientists and attorneys, regulators and administrators. 

All are welcomed to visit JERIC's new incarnation, Volume 38 on the Internet.

 

Oct 25, 2026

Selected items posted on the Internet during the week ending October 23, 2026

A Guide to AI Recruitment Technology for Public Sector Hiring Learn how AI-assisted recruiting can help agencies identify qualified candidates sooner, reduce sourcing work and manage the compliance and security considerations that come with hiring technology. DOWNLOAD

Transforming First Responder Operations With Network Slicing During major incidents, network congestion can make it harder for public safety teams to access the data and applications they rely on. This guide explores how dedicated network resources and priority access can help maintain secure, reliable communications when demand spikes. DOWNLOAD

Outdated software is now a public trust risk See how digital experience shapes citizen satisfaction in Springbrook’s 2026 Citizen Trust and Digital Expectations Survey. LEARN MORE

What IT Teams Require Before AI Acts Buyers want autonomy, not blind trust. G2 research shows 83% need audit trails and rollback before AI acts. Get the Report


Record-high diesel prices are putting pressure on public transit budgets, but some agencies have locked in fuel costs ahead of time through hedging The practice can offer budget predictability, though it carries financial risks and political pitfalls when prices fall. Read More

Communications Resiliency for the Government Workforce This paper explains how agencies can consolidate calling, messaging and collaboration on a single platform to strengthen mobility and continuity of operations. DOWNLOAD

Groups that local governments count on to fill service gaps in the face of cuts to federal programs like SNAP and Medicaid are losing staff and cutting programs Read More

Better User Experiences, Better Government: Designing the Modern Workplace Explore how the Texas Teachers Retirement System redesigned its workplace to create a more seamless employee experience, improve collaboration and reduce IT complexity. DOWNLOAD

Improve productivity by 70% with one unified platform Tanium unifies exposure identification, prioritization, and remediation, so IT and Security stop working across different truths. See a Demo

As fears about doomsday scenarios mount and the federal government drags its feet state governments find themselves at the fore of regulating artificial intelligence. Read More

Oct 23, 2026


Join/Renew
Local and State Government Law Section
Thursday, January 21, 2027
New York Hilton Midtown, 1335 6th Ave, New York, NY
Register Today

Take advantage of early bird savings for the 2027 Annual Conference! Register by November 2, 2026, to save $100 on your general registration fee or take advantage of the Early Bird All Access Pass for just $595.

The All Access Pass gives you access to the Environmental and Energy Law Section programming, the inaugural NYSBA Tech Summit, and additional Section events of your choosing—offering even more opportunities for education, innovation, and networking.

Don’t miss your chance to save and make the most of your Annual Conference experience. Register today before early bird pricing ends!
 

Thursday, January 21, 2027

  • Local and State Government Law Section MCLE Program 8:45 a.m. - 4:15 p.m.
Reserve Your Room Today
Book Hotel
Book your room by January 4, 2027, to receive the discounted group rate.
Special Events

NYSBA Tech Summit
Tuesday, January 19 - Thursday, January 21

Wellness and Self-Care Expo
Tuesday, January 19 - Friday, January 22

Presidential Summit: Civics Convocation
Wednesday, January 20 | 1:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Constance Baker Motley Symposium
Wednesday, January 20 | 4:30 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.

President's Reception: A Celebration of Leadership
Wednesday, January 20 | 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.

Annual Meeting of the Association
Friday, January 22 | 8:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.

Visit the Section Website

This notice was Emailed to NYPER by the New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street Albany, NY, 12207, USA

Posted Pro Bono by New York Public Personnel Law, a Law Blog.

Oct 22, 2026

Defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint granted on showing that Plaintiffs failed to file a timely notice of claim

The Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Westchester County Local #860, Town of Eastchester Unit #9227 and the Town of Eastchester had entered into a collective bargaining agreement [CBA] which provided, among other things, that "seniority shall be the determining factor for selection to a vacant position where all other factors are equal". 

The Town created a new general foreman position, for which two applicants, A and B, had applied. The Town adopted a resolution appointing B to the position. CSEA, on behalf of B, filed a grievance pursuant to the terms of the relevant CBA and ultimately the parties proceeded to non-binding arbitration in accordance with terms set out in the CBA. 

The arbitrator issued an award in favor of CSEA and A [Plaintiffs], which award was rejected by the Town's Board and B [Defendants].

Plaintiffs commenced the instant action against the Defendants seeking damages for breach of contract and for related injunctive and declaratory relief. After joinder of issue, Defendants moved, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint. Supreme Court, among other things, granted that branch of Defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the Plaintiffs' complaint. The Plaintiffs appeal the Supreme Court's ruling.

The Appellate Division, citing Dannemann v Town of E. Hampton Dept. of Land Acquisition & Mgt., 221 AD3d 960, and other decisions and Town Law §65[3]), observed that "The filing of a notice of claim is . . . a condition precedent to the maintenance of an action against a town arising out of the contractual relationship between a plaintiff and a town".  Further, the Appellate Division noted that "Under Town Law §65(3), no action shall be maintained against a town upon or arising out of a contract entered into by the town . . . unless a written verified claim shall have been filed with the town clerk within six months after the cause of action shall have accrued", pointing out that "[I]n contrast to other notice statutes, Town Law §65(3) contains no provision allowing the court to excuse noncompliance with its requirements'".

Observing that Plaintiffs had failed to file a notice of claim, and, contrary to the Plaintiffs' contention, the Appellate Division pointed out that "an exception to the Town Law §65(3) notice of claim requirement is only applicable where a plaintiff has pleaded an ongoing or continuing violation, which the complaint in the present action did not."

As Plaintiffs sought both the recovery of damages and equitable relief, the Appellate Division opined that "the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of this action" and concluded that Supreme Court had properly granted that branch of Defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint". 

Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet.


Oct 21, 2026

Appointing authority may disregard the resignation of an employee in the classified service served with Civil Service Law Section 75 disciplinary charges

Supreme Court denied Petitioner's motion for leave to renew the denial of his 2017 petition brought pursuant to CPLR Article 78 seeking judicial annulment of the City of New York et al's [Respondents] determinations terminating Petitioner's employment at the Administration for Children's Services and disqualifying him from employment with the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission. In addition, Supreme Court imposed sanctions on the Petitioner.

Petitioner appealed the instant decision of the Supreme Court, which ruling was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.

The Appellate Division said that the Supreme Court "providently exercised its discretion in denying [Petitioner's] motion to renew — his fourth — because he did not present any new evidence that would change the prior determination to dismiss the article 78 petition", citing Henry v Peguero, 72 AD3d 600, appeal dismissed, 15 NY3d 820.

Notwithstanding Petitioner's contention that a Kings County Supreme Court issued an order in an April 2025 ruling indicating that Petitioner "resigned from his position rather than being terminated" did not constitute new evidence, citing LFR Collections LLC v Blan Law Offs., 117 AD3d 486 and noting that the Appellate Division had affirmed the dismissal of Plaintiff's petition then at issue, opining that "the Administration for Children's Services properly elected to disregard [Petitioner's] resignation and prosecute the charges of misconduct against him under 4 NYCRR 5.3(b)"*, citing Matter of Patterson v City of New York, 173 AD3d 540. 

In the words of the Appellate Division, "The finding by the Kings County Supreme Court that [Petitioner] resigned therefore does not change the outcome in any of the prior decisions in this case", again citing LFR Collections, 117 AD3d at 487.

*4 NYCRR 5.3(b), in relevant part, provides "Notwithstanding the provisions of this subdivision, when charges of incompetency or misconduct have been or are about to be filed against an employee, the appointing authority may elect to disregard a resignation filed by such employee and to prosecute such charges and, in the event that such employee is found guilty of such charges and dismissed from the service, his termination shall be recorded as a dismissal rather than as a resignation."

Click HERE to access the decision of the Appellate Division posted on the Internet.


Oct 20, 2026

Requesting the reconsideration of an administrative decision does not extend the running of the statute of limitations to appeal that decision

In this action to recover damages for alleged employment discrimination on the basis of disability in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law and the New York City Human Rights Law, Supreme Court granted the Employer's [Defendant] motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff appealed the Supreme Court's decision.

The Appellate Division, noting that:

1. Actions alleging discrimination under the NYSHRL and NYCHRL must be commenced within three years after the alleged unlawful discriminatory practice or act of discriminatory harassment; and 

2. An employment discrimination claim accrues on the date that an adverse employment determination is made and communicated to the plaintiff. 

Plaintiff failing to establish his entitlement to a disabled veteran's credit started the running of the applicable statute of limitations. 

Plaintiff's written request seeking administrative reconsideration of Defendant's decision to withdraw the Plaintiff's disabled veteran's credit did not toll the statute of limitations, nor did it allow the Plaintiff to circumvent the statute of limitations by demanding that the Defendant change its determination and thereafter commencing an action when that demand was refused. Indeed, the Appellate Division's decision points out the Plaintiff commenced the instant action almost five years after Defendant notified the Plaintiff that he was ineligible for a disabled veteran's credit.

In the words of the Appellate Division: "Supreme Court properly granted the [Defendant's] motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the complaint and dismissed Plaintiff's appeal of the Supreme Court's decision.

Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet.


Oct 19, 2026

Selected New York State Education Law §§306 or 310 administrative decisions by New York State's Commissioner of Education

Decision No. 18,854 - Application for the removal of a trustee of the Board of Education of the Enlarged City School District of the City of Middletown. Click HERE to access the Commissioner's decision posted on the Internet. 

Decision No. 18,855 - Application for the removal of trustees of the Board of Education of the Enlarged City School District of Middletown. Click HERE to access the Commissioner's decision posted on the Internet.


Decision No. 18,860 - Appeal from action of the Board of Education of the Pine Valley Central School District regarding financial practices. Click HERE to access the Commissioner's decision posted on the Internet. 


Decision No. 18,861 - Appeal of action of the Board of Education of the Kenmore-Tonawanda Union Free School District regarding a personnel matter. Click HERE to access the Commissioner's decision posted on the Internet.  



Oct 17, 2026

Selected items posted on the Internet during the week ending October 16, 2026

As of May 2026, the more than 1.9 million New York students participated in the school lunch program are at risk  According to a report prepared by New York State's Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli, recent federal changes (Public Law 119-21) in 2025 restricts eligibility to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program [SNAP] and Medicaid MORE

Improving Emergency Response with Modern Cellular Networks This e-book features real-world examples from police, fire, EMS, and 911 agencies that have strengthened connectivity across vehicles, stations, and temporary command sites. DOWNLOAD


Modernize Government Operations Evaluate AI infrastructure needs with NVIDIA RTX PRO™ 4500 Blackwell Workstation Edition. Learn More


Protecting Yourself and Your Team: Coverage Essentials for Businesses The New York State Workers' Compensation Board continues its monthly webinar series for employers and human resources (HR) representatives and there is still time to register for this Thursday, October 22, 2026 12:00 p.m. – 1:00 p.m. free session Register here


Modernize Government Operations Evaluate AI infrastructure needs with NVIDIA RTX PRO™ 4500 Blackwell Workstation Edition. Learn More



Oct 16, 2026

A court may set aside an administrative penalty only if it is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness

The New York State Division of Human Rights [Division] initiated this proceeding pursuant to Executive Law §298 to enforce a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights. The Commissioner's determination adopted the recommendation and findings of an Administrative Law Judge, made after a hearing, finding that the Respondents unlawfully discriminated against the Plaintiff on the basis of her sex, inter alia, and awarded her compensatory damages in the principal sum of $75,000 for mental anguish and attorneys' fees in the principal sum of $24,640.50, and assessed a civil fine and penalty against the Respondents in the principal sum of $50,000.

The Appellate Division granted Division's petition, without costs or disbursements, and confirmed the Division's determination finding that the Respondent unlawfully discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of her sex. The Court directed the Respondent to pay the Plaintiff compensatory damages in the principal sum of $75,000 for mental anguish, plus interest at the rate of 9% per year from February 24, 2023, and $24,640.50 for attorneys' fees, plus interest at the rate of 9% per year from February 24, 2023, and to pay the New York State Division of Human Rights the principal sum of $50,000, plus interest at the rate of 9% per year from February 24, 2023, as a civil fine and penalty.

The text of the Appellate Division's decision is set out below:

In the Matter of New York State Division of Human Rights, petitioner

v

Boston Market Corporation, et al., respondents.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, 

Second Judicial Department

Decided on October 14, 2026

2025-01314, (Index No. 9158/24)

Editor in Chief Harvey Randall served as Director of Personnel, State University of New York Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor's Office of Employee Relations; Principal Attorney, Counsel's Office, New York State Department of Civil Service; and Colonel, JAG, Command Headquarters, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com