ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN PREPARING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Jul 7, 2025

Disciplinary penalty of termination imposed on an employee following a disciplinary action held shocking to one's sense of fairness

Citing Matter of Kreisler v New York City Tr. Auth., 2 NY3d 775, the Appellate Division said "A court may set aside an administrative penalty only if "it is so disproportionate to the offense . . . as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law"."

In determining if the penalty imposed is "shocking to one's sense of fairness", the Appellate Division said that a sanction imposed that is "is disproportionate to the misconduct, incompetence, failure or turpitude of the individual"; or "to the harm or risk of harm to the agency or institution"; or "to the public generally visited or threatened by the derelictions of the individual", is deemed "shocking to one's sense of fairness".

In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review the employer's [Town] adoption of the hearing officer's findings that the employee [Plaintiff] was "guilty of misconduct and insubordination" and the hearing officer's recommendation that the Plaintiff be terminated, Supreme Court granted the Plaintiff's petition seeking to annul the penalty, and remitted the matter to the Town for the Town's imposition of a less severe penalty. The Town appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.

The Appellate Division, noting that the Plaintiff had been employed by the Town for approximately five years in a variety of positions, had filed disciplinary charges against the Plaintiff alleging misconduct and insubordination related to Plaintiff's alleged "absences from work without leave". 

In the words of the Appellate Division, "... contrary to the [Town's] contention, under the circumstances of this case,* the imposed penalty of termination is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness". 

Accordingly, Appellate Division held that "the Supreme Court properly granted the [Plaintiff's] petition, annulled the penalty, and remitted the matter to [the Town] for the imposition of a less severe penalty."

Click HERE to access the decision of the Appellate Division posted on the Internet.

A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances - NYPPL's 442-page e-book focusing on determining an appropriate disciplinary penalty to be imposed on an employee in the public service in instances where the employee has been found guilty of misconduct or incompetence. For more information click on http://booklocker.com/books/7401.html


NYPPL Publisher Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; and Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com