Infographic on White Collar Crime

Infographic on White Collar Crime
Gould School of Law, University of Southern California

The University of Southern California's Gould School of Law has posted an “infographic” on the Internet focusing on white collar crime.

The infographic states that “White collar crime is as old as business itself, with the pioneers of the art form resorting to crude measures to bilk others out of their hard earned currency.” USC notes that one of the earliest recorded white collar crimes concerned an importer who, after taking out a loan to acquire goods for sale, planned to fake a shipwreck and make off with the goods and money.

Another such scheme was the genesis of the ruling of the Lord Chief Justice, the 1st Earl of Mansfield [William Murray], in the Zone case [Gregson v Gilbert (1783) 3 Doug. KB 232]. Lord Mansfield's decision contributed to the adoption of the British Slave Trade Act of 1807 [47 Geo 3 Sess 1 c 36 ], which abolished slave trade in the British empire.

USC's infographic is posted on the Internet at: http://onlinellm.usc.edu/white-collar-crime/

The jurisdiction of New York State’s Division of Human Rights is limited to resolving complaints of alleged unlawful discrimination involving an employer, an employment agency, or a labor union

The jurisdiction of New York State’s Division of Human Rights is limited to resolving complaints of alleged unlawful discrimination involving an employer, an employment agency, or a labor union
Malcolm v New York State Dept. of Labor, 2014 NY Slip Op 07852, Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Bernice Malcolm filed a complaint of unlawful discrimination with the New York State Division of Human Rights in which she named the New York State Department of Labor [DOL] as one of a number of respondents.

The New York State’s Division of Human Rights dismissed that part of her complaint that alleged unlawful discrimination on the part of the New York State Department of Labor “for lack of jurisdiction.” Supreme Court sustained the Division’s decision and Malcolm appealed.

The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s ruling, holding that Supreme Court’s dismissal with respect to DOL was not arbitrary or capricious. The court explained that DOL was not Malcolm’s employer nor was it an employment agency or a labor organization.*Accordingly, said the court, subdivisions (a), (b) and (c) of §296.1, of the Executive Law were inapplicable with respect to DOL and the State's Division of Human Rights lacked jurisdiction of over the matters alleged in Malcolm’s complaint with respect to that agency.

* §292 of the Executive Law defines the terms “employer,” employment agency and labor organization for the purposes of Article 15, the State’s Human Rights Law.

The decision is posted on the Internet at:

http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2014/2014_07852.htm
.

Selected reports and information published by New York State's Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli on December 3, 2014

Selected reports and information published by New York State's Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli on December 3, 2014
Click on text highlighted in color  to access the full report

Department of Health (DOH): Improper Payments Related to the Medicare Buy-In Program (Follow-Up) (2014-F-12)
An initial audit report issued in October 2012 determined that, from March 2006 through February 2011, Medicaid made nearly 260,000 improper payments (totaling about $26.8 million) for people enrolled in the Medicare buy-in program. In a follow-up, auditors found that DOH officials made progress in addressing the problems identified in the initial audit report. However, further actions are still needed as millions of dollars in questionable and improper Medicaid payments continue to be paid for people enrolled in the Medicare buy-in program. 

Department of Health: Medicaid Program – Excessive Medicaid Payments to Federally Qualified Health Centers for Group Therapy Services (2013-S-51)With approval from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, DOH amended the Medicaid State Plan in 2008 to allow Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) to provide group therapy services, including group therapy provided by clinical social workers, to Medicaid recipients. FQHCs are organizations such as community health centers and public housing centers that provide primary and preventive care to underserved populations. Auditors found that during the audit period, Medicaid overpaid four FQHCs $7.7 million because the FQHCs billed incorrect reimbursement rates on their claims for group therapy services. The FQHCs billed an approximate rate of $200 per person for group therapy, as opposed to the required $35.16 rate per person.
Hudson River-Black River Regulating District: Financial Management Practices (2013-S-55)
Auditors found revenue from statutory beneficiaries, hydropower agreements, and permit holders has not been sufficient to cover the district’s annual needs. Since September 2009, the district has had a significant backlog of capital projects because of funding limitations, including one project that had been mandated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in 2007 for public safety reasons. The district has cut spending and taken other steps to balance its annual budgets. However, it could potentially generate more revenue and become more efficient by strengthening its practices over past-due assessments, facility maintenance, equipment inventories, time and attendance, and procurement. 

Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP): Riverbank State Park Administration of the Concession Contract With Riverbank Restaurant Group (RRG) (2013-S-22)
OPRHP entered into a 10-year contract with RRG to provide food concession services at Riverbank State Park in Manhattan. The anticipated state revenues resulting from this contract were estimated at $160,000 annually. RRG was also contractually required to invest a minimum of $622,000 in capital improvements and concession-related upgrades. Auditors found RRG’s reported monthly sales, and the office’s associated licensing fees, were significantly less than anticipated in the contract – about $11.6 million in sales and $580,000 in licensing fees from 2005 to 2009. Further, RRG did not submit the correct amount of licensing fees on the revenues it did report. At the time of the audit, RRG owed OPRHP $136,459 in licensing fees. OPRHP did not perform a thorough vendor responsibility check on RRG before the contract was awarded, and did not adequately monitor RRG operations on a timely basis. 
 

A public officer failing to file a timely oath of office forfeits his or her appointment or election to such office

A public officer failing to file a timely oath of office forfeits his or her appointment or election to such office

Public Officers Law §30

§30 of the Public Officers Law, among other things, provides that “Every office shall be vacant" upon the refusal or neglect of the individual to file his or her official oath or undertaking, if  one is required, before or within thirty days after the commencement of  the term of office for which he or she is chosen, if an elective office, or if an appointive  office, within thirty days after notice of his or her appointment, or within thirty days after the commencement of such term; or to file a renewal undertaking within the time required by law, or if   no time be so specified, within thirty  days  after  notice  to  him or her in   pursuance of law, that such renewal undertaking is required.*

As an example, the Schenectady Gazette recently reported that three members of the Saratoga Springs Housing Authority were removed from their respective offices because they each had failed to sign their oaths of office within thirty days of taking office as required by §30.1(h) of the Public Officers Law.

Timely filing the required oath or undertaking is critical as the Appellate Division ruled in Lombino v Town Board, Town of Rye, 206 AD2d 462. John V. Lombino contended that he had filed his oath of office on January 3. The court, however, determined that Lombino was notified of his appointment to the position of Assessor in November and began working on December 3. Thus, said the court, even if Lombino filed his oath of office on January 3 as claimed, the filing was more than 30 days after both the notification and commencement of his term and the Town Board properly declared the office of Assessor vacant.**

* Subject to other provisions, the neglect   or failure of any state or local officer to execute and file his or her oath of office and official undertaking within the time limited therefor by law shall not create a vacancy in the office if such officer was on active duty in the armed forces of the United States and absent from the county   of his or her residence at the time of his or her election or appointment.

** See, also, Scro v Board of Educ. of Jordan-Elbridge Cent. School Dist., 87 A.D.3d 1342 and Formal Opinions of the Attorney General, Opinion 98-F6.

.

Maggie Miller named Chief Information Officer of the New York State Office of Information Technology Services

Maggie Miller named Chief Information Officer of the New York State Office of Information Technology Services
Source: Office of the Governor

On December 3, 2014, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo announced that he has appointed Maggie Miller Chief Information Officer of the New York State Office of Information Technology Services. Miller will oversee the agency’s centralized IT services to the State and government entities; set statewide technology policy for all state government agencies; and monitor all large technology expenditures in the state to find more efficient, low cost and innovative solutions. Ms. Miller, the former Chief Information Officer of Girl Scouts USA, is expert in IT strategy, innovation, business transformation, multi-channel strategies, M&A evaluation and integration, business intelligence and analytics, and outsourcing.

Ms. Miller will begin her position as Chief Information Officer of the State Information Technology Services on December 8, 2014. This appointment does not require Senate confirmation.