Some guidelines followed by the courts when reviewing disciplinary arbitration awards
Some guidelines followed by the courts when reviewing disciplinary arbitration awards
Matter of Watt v East Greenbush Cent. School Dist., 2011 NY Slip Op 04795,
510841
In considering an appeal of an adverse disciplinary arbitration pursuant to Article 75 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, the Appellate Division observed that:
- Courts must review Education Law §3020-a disciplinary determinations by a Hearing Officer in accordance with the provision set out in §7511 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, which section permits vacatur of an award on grounds of misconduct, abuse of power or procedural defects.*
- Where the parties are required to submit the matter to arbitration, in contrast to submitting the matter to “voluntary arbitration,” courts must ensure that the award comports with due process and is supported by adequate evidence
- A court, when conducting its review of an arbitration award, must accept the Hearing Officer's credibility determinations.
- The free speech rights of school employees are not violated when a school district
imposes discipline on teachers for directing ethnic slurs or disparaging comments towards students in class. - Ethnic comments deemed offensive or embarrassing by students is a proper basis for initiating disciplinary action against a teacher.
* Courts have also vacated arbitration awards found to violate “strong public policy.”
The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2011/2011_04795.htm
CAUTION
Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the decisions summarized here. Accordingly, these summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
NYPPL Blogger Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; and Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard.
Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
New York Public Personnel Law.
Email: publications@nycap.rr.com