ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN THE SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS PREPARED BY NYPPL

August 24, 2011

The Fireman's Rule


The Fireman's Rule
Currie v McQueen, Supreme Court, Nassau County, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]

A New York City police officer sued to recover damages for injuries he sustained on when, while in the course of his duties, he was assaulted by McQueen as he attempted to arrest him during a public demonstration.

McQueen contended that Currie's action for assault is barred by the “Fireman's Rule” as set out by the Court of Appeals in Santangelo v State, 71 NY2d 393.

In Santangelo, the Court of Appeals expressly barred police officers from bringing a personal injury action sounding in negligence arising from “the very situations that create the occasion for their services.”

Justice Phelan said that the holding in Santangelo and similar cases was effectively overruled by an amendment to the Section 11-106 of the General Obligations Law. Section 11-106 gives a limited right of recovery to police officers and firefighters injured by the negligence or intentional conduct of any person except an employer or co-employee.

The theory underlying this change: although public policy considerations support the preclusion of negligence claims against the governmental entities which employ firefighters and police officers are cogent, these considerations do not justify barring firefighters and police officers from recovering damages when they are injured or killed as a result of the negligence of private parties.

Expanding on this, Justice Phelan ruled that there is even less justification in barring recovery resulting from the intentional acts of a private party and rejected McQueen's motion to dismiss Currie's complaint “sounding in assault and battery.”

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the decisions summarized here. Accordingly, these summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law Blog Editor Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; and Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
Copyright 2009-2024 - Public Employment Law Press. Email: nyppl@nycap.rr.com.