ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN PREPARING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS

March 27, 2025

Administrative Law Judge recommends a 45 day suspension without pay be imposed on an employee found guilty of storing and discharging an air rifle in a City of New York's building

New York City Office of Administrative Hearings and Trials Administrative Law Judge [ALJ] Faye Lewis recommended a 45-day suspension without pay as the penalty to be imposed on custodial engineer [Respondent] found guilty of storing an air rifle in a Department of Education warehouse building and fired it in the trucking bays of the warehouse on a Saturday when no one else was in the building. Respondent did not deny this allegation and testified that he brought the air rifle into the building and fired it on one occasion for the sole purpose of scaring away pigeons that had been roosting in the bay areas of the building, defecating on plastic wrapped pellets of food trays that were distributed to schools, and disturbing asbestos installation on the pipes. 

The ALJ found Respondent’s testimony to be clear, consistent, unrebutted, and corroborated by documentary evidence, such as emails and photographs documenting the significant health concerns posed by the pigeons. While the ALJ found that Respondent’s use of the air rifle was well-intentioned, she concluded that the storage and firing of the air rifle constituted misconduct as it showed poor judgment and was contrary to well-known standards of conduct. 

The ALJ dismissed the remaining charges against Respondent for storing alcohol and parking his motorcycle on petitioner’s property because the Petitioner [Employer] failed to produce sufficient evidence linking Respondent to the alcohol and failed to establish that parking his motorcycle constituted misconduct. 

Lastly, the ALJ dismissed a charge relating to the transfer or sale of Department property as time-barred. The ALJ rejected Employer’s argument that Respondent should be terminated for this misconduct, noting that there was significant mitigation underlying Respondent’s actions and that he has had a lengthy tenure with the Employer with high performance evaluations and no history of discipline. 

Accordingly, the ALJ recommended a 45-day suspension with credit for a 30-day pretrial suspension served. 

Click HERE to access Judge Lewis' decision posted on the Internet.

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
NYPPL Publisher Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; and Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com