ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED IN COMPOSING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS.

Jan 22, 2026

A party's request that the administrative tribunal reconsider its decision does not extend the statute of limits to appeal the administrative decision

In this appeal to the Commissioner of Education the Respondent [School District] contended that the appeal must be dismissed as untimely, among other reasons. 

The Commissioner agreed, explaining that an appeal to the Commissioner of Education must be commenced within 30 days from the administrative decision or act complained of, "unless any delay is excused by the Commissioner for good cause shown" and it is the actual knowledge of the facts underlying a claim that begins the running of the 30-day period in which the aggrieved party may bring the proceeding.

In this instance the Commissioner noted that the Petitioners had received actual notice of the School District's decision on June 27, 2025 but did not commence their appeal until August 25, 2025, more than 30 days after had knowledge of the School District's ruling.  

Although Petitioners had requested the School District reconsider its decision, the Commissioner noted that such a request does not extend the time limits within which a petitioner may file an appeal to the Commissioner.

As Petitioners did not offer any explanation for the delay in their submitting their appeal to the Commissioner, the Commissioner held that Petitioner's appeal must be dismissed as untimely.

Click HERE to access the Commissioner's decision posted on the Internet.


Editor in Chief Harvey Randall served as Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration, Director of Research , Governor's Office of Employee Relations; Principal Attorney, Counsel's Office, New York State Department of Civil Service, and Colonel, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com