ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED IN COMPOSING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS.

Feb 4, 2026

Agency's timely response defeats plaintiff's claim that his Freedom of Information request was constructively denied

The New York City Department of Social Services [Department] denied Plaintiff's [Petitioner] administrative appeal challenging the denial of his Freedom of Information Law [FOIL] request. Petitioner then appealed the Department's action by filing a CPLR Article 78 appeal in Supreme Court challenging the Department's decision. Supreme Court dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.

The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, finding that the Department did not constructively deny* [Petitioner's] FOIL request as it had mailed the Department's response to Petitioner within five days of its the receipt of the FOIL request and, in addition, the Department had notified Petitioner by email that same day "that it had mailed the response".

Further, the Appellate Division's decision notes that the Department's mailing to the Petitioner "was postmarked April 1, 2024" and advised the Petitioner that Petitioner had 30 days from receipt of the letter to appeal. 

As the postal service first attempted to deliver the Department's denial letter on April 9, 2024, and Petitioner mailed his appeal on May 8, 29 days later, the Appellate Division ruled that Petitioner's administrative appeal was timely.

* "Constructive denial" is a concept pursuant to which an agency's failure to respond to a timely FOIL  request within the timeframe otherwise required is deemed to have been a denial of the FOIL request by the agency.

Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet.


Editor in Chief Harvey Randall served as Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration, Director of Research , Governor's Office of Employee Relations; Principal Attorney, Counsel's Office, New York State Department of Civil Service, and Colonel, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com