ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED IN COMPOSING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS.

Jun 1, 2026

Employee failed to link his termination to his religion rather than his noncompliance with New York City's vaccine mandate

Supreme Court granted New York City's motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's [Employee] unlawful discrimination complaint and denied Employee's cross-motion to compel discovery as moot. The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's decision, noting that "Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint as against defendant New York City Police Department, which is a non-suable agency of the City", citing Troy v City of New York, 160 AD3d 410.

Addressing the merits of the Employee's complaint, the Appellate Division said "Plaintiff failed to allege any nonconclusory facts linking his termination to his religion rather than his noncompliance with the [New York City's] vaccine mandate" as he cited no nexus to a religious prohibition against vaccination.

The Court also observed that Employee failed to establish he suffered "constructive discharge" as "he advanced no nonconclusory facts that the Employer deliberately created working conditions so intolerable, difficult or unpleasant that a reasonable person would have felt compelled to resign".

With respect to Employee's alleged "lack of cooperative dialogue" claim, the Appellate Division noted that Supreme Court had properly dismissed that contention as Employee had "availed himself of the approved appeals process and failed to establish how it fell short of the New York State or New York City Human Rights Law."

The Appellate Division also noted that Employee's "Free Exercise claim fails, as there is no private right of action to recover damages for state constitutional violations where alternative remedies exist".

Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet.


May 30, 2026

Selected Internet blog posts for the week ending May 29, 2026

2026 AI Risk and Readiness Report Most organizations are making decisions about AI security without a full picture of how it’s being used across their environment. Based on new data from over 1,200 cybersecurity professionals, this report highlights where those visibility gaps commonly exist and what they mean for managing data and risk. DOWNLOAD

Broadband-Powered Mobile Is Changing the Marketplace Cable mobile uses the broadband infrastructure and Wi-Fi networks to deliver choice, competition, and more affordable plans to Americans. Learn more

Affordable Connectivity Supports Everyday Opportunity From homework to telehealth to job searches, families need reliable connectivity at a price they can manage. See how the cable industry helps. Learn more

Why Identity Is Now Core HHS Infrastructure For HHS agencies, identity verification is no longer a support function. This paper explains how modern identity platforms give agencies a consistent, risk-based way to verify new applicants and returning beneficiaries. DOWNLOAD

Solving AI Governance Across the Public Sector Many agencies are trying to create AI policies while employees are already using AI tools. This executive brief examines the operational realities behind AI governance, including how organizations can uncover hidden usage, clarify ownership, and manage risk without slowing down productivity. DOWNLOAD

Preventing Outbound Email Data Loss Across the Public Sector Learn how behavioral AI and adaptive email security help public sector organizations prevent misdirected emails and data loss.  WATCH NOW

Break the Silos: Real-Time Public Safety with 5G Learn how to improve public safety response with secure 5G communications that unite agencies in real time, fast. WATCH NOW

Fighting the Cyber 'Domino Effect' Join us with Google to learn practical strategies for securing endpoints, managing SaaS risk, and building a more resilient cybersecurity posture. WATCH NOW

Reimagining Cybersecurity Workflows with the State of Kansas Learn how agencies are modernizing endpoint visibility and strengthening their security operations. WATCH NOW

Mission Possible: Operationalizing AI in Government Learn how governments can turn AI experimentation into practical solutions that improve public services and agency efficiency. WATCH NOW


May 29, 2026

Proposed State-CSEA agreement would cover more than 55,000 employees of the State of New York

On May 29, 2026, Governor Kathy Hochul reported that her administration has reached a contract agreement with the Civil Service Employee Association (CSEA) for a five-year term running until April 1, 2031. The agreement is subject to ratification by union membership, which includes more than 55,000 New York State employees in a wide variety of roles.

CSEA President Mary E. Sullivan said, “We applaud Governor Hochul’s recognition of the hard work CSEA members provide to the state every day through this fair contract. This agreement delivers meaningful wage increases and helps address affordability challenges working people are facing.”

The agreement includes increases in salary for employees in each year of the agreement. 

The agreement also includes paid prenatal leave, increases in location pay and health insurance changes that reduce costs for employees by eliminating certain co-pays and minimizing reliance on out of network providers.

CSEA represents New York State employees in four collective bargaining units and the proposed contract agreement must be ratified by CSEA rank and file members.


 


Editor in Chief Harvey Randall served as Director of Personnel, State University of New York Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor's Office of Employee Relations; Principal Attorney, Counsel's Office, New York State Department of Civil Service; and Colonel, JAG, Command Headquarters, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com