Teacher's aide denied unemployment insurance benefits after being found to have left his employment for personal and noncompelling reasons

An individual [Claimant] had been employed as a teacher's aide. He quit this position in order to become a full-time student and earn his bachelor's degree. Claimant had filed for unemployment insurance benefits but the New York State Department of Labor issued an initial determination finding that Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits.

After an administrative hearing, an Administrative Law Judge [ALJ] affirmed the Department of Labor's denial of Claimant's application for unemployment insurance benefits.

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board [Board] sustained the ALJ's ruling, explaining that the Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits as the result of Claimant's having "voluntarily left his employment without good cause." Claimant appealed the Board's determination.

Citing Matter of Lee [Commissioner of Labor], 190 AD3d 1170, and other court decisions, the Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, noting "It is well established that resigning from a position in order to pursue academic studies, while commendable, constitutes a personal and noncompelling reason for separating from one's employment, disqualifying a claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits."

The Appellate Division said it was undisputed that Claimant left his employment in order to complete an undergraduate degree program. Accordingly, substantial evidence supported the Board's finding that Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits as he had "voluntarily left his employment without good cause," and dismissed Claimant's appeal.

Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet.

 

State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli reports a decline in local government employment outside New York City

On December 14, 2023, New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli issued a report indicating a decline in local government employment in New York State in contrast to the nation as a whole. The Comptroller's report indicates that although the nation as a whole saw a 2% increase in the number of full-time employees over a 15-year period, employment in New York's local government workforce levels contracted, mostly due to two key events: the Great Recession of 2007-09 and the COVID-19 pandemic.

“We all rely on local government employees for essential services such as education, public safety, health care, and much more,” DiNapoli said. “But local governments were hard hit by two major events, most recently the pandemic, that have taken their toll on staffing levels. Local officials must continue to meet the difficult task of balancing their budgets while making certain they have the staff in place to ensure critical services are there for their residents.

"DiNapoli’s report shows the state’s full-time local government workforce outside New York City decreased by 50,000 workers (11.1%) since the end of the Great Recession. While this was similar to the national trend, New York experienced more year-over-year volatility and a longer period of overall economic decline. As full-time workforce numbers were starting to rebound, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic led to another reduction. While billions of dollars in federal pandemic relief aid to local governments and school districts likely helped employment numbers recover some in 2022, they remain below 2009 levels.

"DiNapoli’s report also found the following with respect to full-time local government workers outside New York City:

• Regionally, more local employees worked upstate (55%) as opposed to downstate in 2022. Upstate local governments employed 415 workers per 10,000 residents, significantly more than downstate (381).

• Funding from various federal emergency relief programs, as well as the restoration of state aid cuts and a rebound in sales tax collections, helped many local governments through the pandemic enabling them to restore full-time staffing to near pre-pandemic levels in 2022. Despite this, overall employment was still below 2009 levels.
• School districts were the largest local government employer in 2022, with 271,611 full-time workers, of which over two-thirds were instructional staff. Counties were second, with 92,413 employees, followed by cities and villages (54,395), and towns (28,418).
  
• The average annual salary for full-time local government employees was approximately $76,700 in 2022, up from about $53,900 in 2007. However, after adjusting for inflation, the average annual salary was nearly flat with an overall increase of 2.1% from 2007 to 2022.
• Workers employed in police protection were the highest paid local government employees in 2022, with an average annual salary of $104,742, followed by fire protection employees ($91,300). Public welfare employees had the lowest average annual salary at $59,133."

Click the URL below to access the Comptroller's Report posted on the Internet:

Local Government Workforce Trends in New York State

###

 

Municipal and School audits released by New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli

On December 13, 2023, New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli announced the following Municipal and School audits were issued.

Click on the text highlighted in color to access both the summary and the complete audit report

 

Fillmore Central School District – Credit Cards and Purchase Cards (Allegany County) Although the 230 charges reviewed by auditors totaling approximately $40,000 were for appropriate district purposes, charges were not properly approved or adequately supported. All 230 charges had one or more exceptions that could have led to potentially inappropriate card use, including approximately $38,000 in charges were not properly approved prior to the card being used; and approximately $12,000 in charges did not have adequate support to show what was purchased.

 

Hastings-on-Hudson Union Free School District - Information Technology (IT) (Westchester County) District officials did not ensure that unneeded network user accounts were disabled in a timely manner. As a result, 21% of the district’s network user accounts were unneeded and provided additional entry points that could have been used to inappropriately access the network and view personal, private and sensitive information, make unauthorized changes to records, deny legitimate access to electronic information, or gain access to or control over other IT functions. Auditors found that officials did not convey management’s expectations for managing network user accounts through written policies and procedure or disable 551 unneeded network user accounts.

 

Stafford Fire Department Inc. - Financial Management (Genesee County) The board and treasurer did not properly manage the department’s finances. The board did not adopt realistic budgets or take an active role in monitoring department finances. As a result, the operating budget was underestimated by $29,667 in 2021 and by $33,298 in 2022. Auditors found the board did not:  include revenue estimates in the budgets for 2021, 2022 and 2023. It did not develop a written multiyear financial or capital plan to help guide budget development and save for capital asset and equipment purchases.

 

Town of Baldwin – Claims Auditing (Chemung County) The board did not always properly audit claims before approving them for payment. Due to insufficient documentation, auditors were unable to determine, and the board was unable to support, it approved claims before payment. A review of 71 claims totaling approximately $55,100 determined that town officials did not comply with the town’s procurement policy. In addition, 23 claims totaling approximately $35,000 did not contain evidence that the required competition was sought and nine claims totaling approximately $7,400 were not supported with sufficient documentation such as detailed receipts, weigh tickets or itemized invoices.

 

Town of Berkshire – Procurement and Conflict of Interest (Tioga County) The board did not consistently seek competition for purchases or avoid conflicts of interest. As a result, goods and services may not have been procured in a cost-effective manner. Of the 113 purchases totaling $771,727 auditors reviewed, officials did not seek or could not support that they sought competition for 36 purchases totaling $211,171, or 27.  The town may have saved $3,891 on diesel fuel purchases if town officials had used the New York State Office of General Services contract to purchase diesel fuel. Additionally, the highway superintendent had a prohibited interest in a contract between the town and his construction company, providing construction services totaling $3,000.

 

Town of Hamburg - Finance Office (Erie County) The board and town officials did not ensure that credit card purchases were supported and for proper purposes. As a result, the former director of finance made improper credit card purchases totaling approximately $2,000 and approved her own credit card purchases. The former director was arrested in September 2022 for charges relating to her use of the town’s credit card. She pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct in December 2022. Additionally, the board and town officials did not ensure the finance office payroll was accurate and supported. The town also made improper, questionable and unsupported payroll payments totaling more than $19,000 to the former director while an employee who reported to her received unsupported out-of-title payroll payments totaling approximately $1,400. Additionally, personnel directors approved their own overtime pay totaling more than $5,000. 

###

Challenging the denial of Petitioner's request to use school facilities and seeking the removal of certain school personnel

The Petitioner in this appeal to the Commissioner of Education:

[1] challenged the Board of Education's denial of his request to use district facilities in order to "operate an afterschool program" for a second year: and 

[2] sought the removal of the superintendent.

With respect to Petitioner's application seeking the removal of the superintendent, the Commissioner said Petitioner's application to remove the Superintendent must be denied because Petitioner's application lacked "the notice required by section 277.1(b) of the Commissioner’s regulations".

Citing Application of Johnson, et al., 56 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,055, and other Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, the Commissioner explained "a removal application that does not include the specific notice required by 8 NYCRR 277.1(b) is fatally defective and must be denied."*

Turning to the merits of the Petitioner's appeal, the Commissioner indicated  Education Law §414 provides that "boards of education may permit the use of district grounds and other property when not in use for school business for certain specific purposes. Further, the Commissioner noted that the New York State Court of Appeals has held that local school boards "exercise ultimate authority for access to students, school buildings and school property generally"** and that a school board’s determination in this regard may only be reversed if it is determined to be arbitrary or capricious.

Referring to information in the record, the Commissioner found that the school board "possessed ample justification to decline [Petitioner’s] request to utilize its facilities", opining that permitting Petitioner to continue using school facilities "could foreseeably lead to safety or liability issues."

Accordingly, the Commissioner dismissed Petitioner's appeal and denied Petitioner's application.

* §277.1(b) sets out the specific notice required for removal applications pursuant to Education Law §306, which is distinct from the notice required under §275.11(a) for appeals pursuant to Education Law §310.

** See Matter of Lloyd v. Grella, 83 NY2d 537.

Click HERE to access the full text of the Commissioner's decision posted on the Internet.