ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED IN COMPOSING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS.

Sep 12, 2023

Selected links to judicial and administrative decisions involving an employee's "absence" from work

An employee's absence from work may be based on various reasons or excuses alleged or claimed by the individual. Below are a number common absences from work that served as the genesis for litigation in New York courts.

Accruing vacation and sick leave credits during leave for ordered military leave

Alleged abused the school district’s leave provisions, http://www.counsel.nysed.gov/Decisions/volume39/d14280.htm

Applying the provisions of Civil Service Law §§71, 72 and 73

Determining the compensation to be paid a teacher absent from work when “school is in recess”

Extension of the probationary period as the result of absence during the probationary period

Employee’s reporting feeling “tired, lethargic, fatigue-ish and ill” insufficient notice to trigger the protections of the FMLA

Filing disciplinary charges against an employee where the absence is due to an injury or disease

Negotiating paid religious holidays  

Requiring employees absent on sick leave to be examined by a physician designated by the employer before returning from such leave

Uninterrupted Civil Service Law §72 absence for one year or more permits termination of employee pursuant to §73 of the Civil Service Law

Workers’ compensation leave pursuant to Civil Service Law Section 71

NYPPL's E-book focusing on disability leave for fire, police and other public sector personnel is available for purchase from BookLocker. For information and access to a free excerpt of the material presented in this e-book, Click HERE

In addition, the New York State Workers’ Compensation Board continues to offer its webinar series for workers and their advocates. Workers’ Comp 202: Best Practices to Access Benefits for Workers, A presentation by the Office of the Advocate for Injured Workers.  Webinars currently scheduled are listed below.

The sessions are free and time for questions is provided.

Tuesday, October 2, 2023
10:00 A.M. - 11:30 A.M.
Register here

Wednesday, December 13, 2023
10:00 A.M. - 11:30 A.M.
Register here

Topics include:

  • Understanding labor market attachment
  • Details on benefit periods and how benefit rates are calculated
  • The importance of items such as the degree of disability and the Carrier Continue Payments (CCP) order
  • How advocates can help workers and comply with privacy provisions
  • The Workers’ Compensation Board’s New York Medical Treatment Guidelines, and more!

 

Sep 10, 2023

Municipal and School Audits released by New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli

On September 8, 2023 New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli announced the following local government and school audits were issued.

Click on the text highlighted in color to access both summary and the complete audit report.

City of Niagara Falls – Sexual Harassment Prevention (SHP) Training (Niagara County)

SHP training was not provided to all employees and elected officials. Of the 65 total individuals auditors tested (59 selected employees and all six elected officials), 14 employees, or 24% of employees tested, and five elected officials did not complete the annual SHP Training. Additionally, the fire department cancelled the annual SHP Training for all 131 of its uniformed personnel.

 

City of Watertown – Sexual Harassment Prevention Training (Jefferson County)

SHP training was provided to employees and elected officials. However, there was a general lack of monitoring to ensure the SHP training was completed by all employees and the city’s training completion records were unreliable. As a result, officials have no assurance that all individuals who should have completed the 2021 SHP training did so.

 

Cold Spring Harbor Central School District – Capital Assets (Suffolk and Nassau Counties)

District officials did not properly record, tag and account for capital asset purchases. As a result, the district has an increased risk that its assets could be lost, misused or stolen. Auditors found: the assistant superintendent for business did not maintain an inventory of capital assets that had a minimum value of $500; 67 capital assets totaling $171,438 were not properly identified or recorded; and the purchasing department did not prepare and distribute unique identification tags for capital assets that were purchased during the audit period.

 

Eldred Central School District – Sexual Harassment Prevention Training (Orange and Sullivan Counties)

SHP training was not provided to all employees or board members and because the district’s training completion records are unreliable, officials have no assurance all individuals required to complete the 2021 SHP training did so. Additionally, the district excluded new hires, and per diem employees from SHP training.

 

Kiryas Joel Village Union Free School District – Network User Account and Shared Network Folder Access (Orange County)

District officials did not adequately secure user account access to the network and shared network folders to help safeguard personal, private and sensitive (PPSI) information. As a result, there is an increased risk of unauthorized access to the network and PPSI stored on shared network folders. Auditors found that officials did not: disable 35 unnecessary former employee shared and service network user accounts, which comprise 11% of the district’s enabled accounts; adequately secure shared network folder access, resulting in users having unnecessary access to multiple forms of PPSI in eight shared folders; or maintain a data inventory to properly protect information technology resources, including data containing PPSI.

 

Lansing Fire District – Investment Program (Tompkins County)

Auditors found the board of fire commissioners did not develop and adopt a comprehensive written investment policy as required by state law. The district earned interest totaling approximately $9,000 from its savings account, which had an average daily balance of approximately $3.8 million during the audit. However, the district could have earned approximately $70,000, or $61,000 more had officials used other available investment options. Officials did not consider other legally permissible investment options or formally solicit interest rate quotes that may have resulted in higher interest earnings.

 

Persistence Preparatory Academy Charter School – Credit Cards (Erie County)

Credit card charges reviewed by auditors were not properly approved or adequately supported, and nearly all the charges lacked support to show they were for a valid school purpose. Auditors reviewed transactions totaling $117,567 and determined that almost 98% lacked documentation to demonstrate the charge’s necessity or the school-related purpose of the charge. For example, charges totaling $22,276 included grocery, alcohol and restaurant purchases, and food purchases for “going away parties,” a teacher’s bridal shower and staff holiday parties. Additionally, the board treasurer did not review credit card charges in a timely manner.

 ###

Sep 8, 2023

PURSUE A CAREER IN PUBLIC SERVICE AS AN ATTORNEY WITH THE STATE OF NEW YORK




NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE ANNOUNCES ONLINE CIVIL SERVICE EXAMINATION NOW AVAILABLE TO PURSUE PUBLIC SERVICE CAREERS AS ATTORNEYS

The New York State Department of Civil Service (DCS) has announced that individuals interested in a career as an attorney in New York State public service can now apply and complete the Legal Specialties exam online. The civil service exam is held continuously and is used to fill multiple attorney titles across New York State agencies. 

Click Here for more information.


People interested in being considered for attorney positions within state government must first meet the minimum qualifications for the exam, which requires candidates to be a graduate of an accredited law school with an LLB or JD degree or be eligible to take the New York State Bar exam. All applicants who meet the minimum qualifications should apply for and complete the exam to be considered for available positions. The online exam will require candidates to provide information about their training and experience with an online questionnaire that is completed and submitted by the candidate. Candidates should be prepared to provide detailed information on their education, work experience, dates of employment, and supervisor contact information to answer the questions completely.

The exam is used to fill the following titles at multiple agencies:

  • Senior Attorney
  • Senior Attorney (Realty)
  • Senior Attorney (Financial Services)
  • Hearing Officer
  • Motor Vehicle Referee/Motor Vehicle Referee (Spanish Language)
  • Unemployment Insurance Referee/Unemployment Insurance Referee (Spanish Language)
  • Several positions within the Legal Specialties Traineeship

All positions include generous benefits including paid leave, health benefits, and retirement plans, and telecommuting options may be available to employees in these titles who meet certain criteria.  

It is estimated that approximately 100 attorney positions will be filled statewide over the next year.

Click Here to learn more about working for the State of New York and how to take the next step in pursuing a rewarding career in public service.

As part of the launch of the Legal Specialties exam, New York State has launched a statewide social media campaign, which will include videos and web content to help attract candidates to apply for the exam. Campaign content and additional information and resources to help candidates complete the exam is available at www.cs.ny.gov/legal-specialties.



Governor Kathy Hochul signs legislation to enhance state and municipal opportunities for employment in the civil service

On September 7, 2023, Governor Kathy Hochul signed two pieces of legislation to expand access to employment opportunities in civil service.

One, Chapter 358 of the Law of 2023, requires the Department of Civil Service and municipal civil service commissions to provide civil service examination announcements to local Boards of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES), school districts, public colleges, public universities, local social services districts, and, to the extent practicable, job training programs.

The other, Chapter 356 of the Laws of 2023, provides that time spent as a provisional employee be counted towards satisfying an employee's probationary period upon receiving a permanent appointment in the same title. The bill provides "Notwithstanding  the foregoing or any law or rule to the contrary, any person appointed provisionally in accordance with section sixty-five of this title who receives a permanent appointment to the same title shall have all time spent as a provisional appointment credited to any  probationary term that is required upon permanent appointment to a position."

 

Sep 7, 2023

Determining the effective date of resignations submitted by public officers of the State of New York and of its political subdivisions

On September 7, 2023, Albany Times Union Columnist Chris Churchill reported that Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany Bishop Edward Scharfenberger "submitted [his resignation] to the Vatican on the occasion of Scharfenberger's May 29 birthday ... reflected that bishops are required to submit their resignation when they turn 75."

Mr. Churchill opined, "Pope Francis can now accept Scharfenberger's resignation and name a replacement. But that isn't expected, principally for two reasons: One, Scharfenberger doesn't want to step down just yet, and, two, it is likely the pope will want the bishop to see out an ongoing Chapter 11 bankruptcy process initiated in response to Child Victims Act claims."

Such is not the case with respect to a resignation submitted by a public officer of the State of New York or a by a public officer of a political subdivision of the State of New York as §31.2 of the New York State Public Officers Law, Resignations,* provides as follows:

"Every resignation shall be in writing addressed to the officer or body to whom it is made. If no effective date is specified in such resignation, it shall take effect upon delivery to or filing with the proper officer or body. If an effective date is specified in such resignation, it shall take effect upon the date specified, provided however, that in no event shall the effective date of such resignation be more than thirty days subsequent to the date of its delivery or filing; except that the effective date of the resignation of a judge or justice of the unified court system may be up to ninety days subsequent to the date on which such resignation is delivered or filed. If a resignation specifies an effective date that is more than thirty days subsequent to the date of its delivery or filing, or more than ninety days subsequent thereto where such resignation is that of a judge or justice, such resignation shall take effect upon the expiration of thirty days from the date of its delivery or filing, or upon the expiration of ninety days therefrom, as appropriate."

The withdrawal of a resignation delivered to the appropriate officer or body typically requires the approval of the appointing authority or body, as the case may be.

* Other state statutes provide for procedures to be followed with respect to the submission of a resignation by particular public officers. In addition, rules and regulations, and provisions set out in a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the so-called Taylor Law, may control with respect to resignations of employees of the State as the employer or employees of a political subdivision of the State as the employer. Further, although not all public employees in the civil service are public officers, all public officers in the civil service are public employees.

 

New York State Public Personnel Law e-books

The Discipline Book - For information and access to a free excerpt of the material presented in this e-book HERE

A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty - For information and access to a free excerpt of the material presented in this e-book Click HERE .

The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual - For information and access to a free excerpt of the material presented in this e-book Click HERE .

Disability Leave for fire, police and other public sector personnel - For information and access to a free excerpt of the material presented in this e-book Click HERE .

 

New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli releases audits

New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli announced the following audits and reports were issued on September 6, 2023.

Click on the text highlighted in color to access the entire audit report.


State University of New York – Oversight of Disability Services (2021-S-42)
The State University of New York (SUNY) is the largest comprehensive system of public education in the nation, serving about 370,000 students each year. During the 2020-21 academic year, 31,367 students self-reported a disability at the campuses. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by public entities, including access to programs, activities, and services. The 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design (ADA Standards) set minimum scoping and technical requirements for newly designed and constructed or altered State and local government facilities, public accommodations, and commercial facilities. For a sample of six campuses (Binghamton University, Maritime College, Stony Brook University, SUNY Morrisville, SUNY Cobleskill, and SUNY Oneonta), auditors found they provided academic accommodations to students with disabilities, provided outreach and training to students and staff about their services, and received no complaints regarding discrimination. With the exception of SUNY Morrisville, the campuses adequately documented that students who reported a disability either were provided accommodations or did not complete the self-reporting process. Additionally, auditors found that buildings, structures, and parking lots at the six campuses were
ADA compliant, but also identified 170 areas where accessibility could potentially be improved should SUNY seek to go beyond the minimum ADA Standards.

 

Department of Health – Improper Medicaid Payments for Outpatient Services Billed as Inpatient Claims (2022-S-16)
The State’s Medicaid program reimburses hospitals for services. A recipient’s status in a hospital – inpatient versus outpatient – affects Medicaid’s reimbursement for services provided. Inpatient care generally requires recipients to stay overnight in the hospital and be monitored throughout treatment and recovery. Generally, outpatient services are medical procedures that can be performed in the same day, commonly making them less expensive because they are less involved and do not require a patient’s continued presence in a facility. The audit identified 34,264 fee-for-service inpatient claims, totaling $360.6 million, where hospitals reported the recipients were discharged within 24 hours of admission. There is a high risk that a portion of these claims were improper if the services provided should have been billed as outpatient. For a judgmental sample of 190 claims, totaling $4,261,428, from six hospitals, auditors found 91 claims (48%), totaling $1,577,821, were billed improperly. There is an equally high risk that a portion of the remaining 34,074 claims, totaling $356 million, were likewise improperly billed as inpatient services.

 

State Education Department (Preschool Special Education Audit Initiative) – Queens Centers for Progress – Compliance With the Reimbursable Cost Manual (2022-S-41)
Queens Centers for Progress, a New York City-based not-for-profit organization, is approved by the State Education Department to provide preschool special education services to children with disabilities who are between the ages of 3 and 5 years. For the 3 fiscal years ended
June 30, 2019, Queens Centers for Progress reported approximately $14.8 million in reimbursable costs for the SED preschool cost-based programs. Auditors identified $257,297 in reported costs that did not comply with requirements.

 

New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development – Mitchell-Lama Vacancies (Follow-Up) (2022-F-34)
The Mitchell-Lama Housing Program provides affordable rental and cooperative housing to middle-income families. The New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) supervises 93 Mitchell-Lama rental and limited-equity cooperative developments with approximately 47,000 total apartments in NYC. Apartments in Mitchell-Lama developments tend to be desirable because of their affordability; consequently, the waiting lists for many of these apartments can be quite lengthy. To ensure efficient turnover of vacant apartments, HPD’s Reporting and Compliance Directive (Directive) requires developments to fill vacancies within 120 days. A prior audit report, issued in July 2021, found that, despite the scarcity of affordable housing, vacant apartments were generally not filled in the 120-day time frame, with 1,286 apartments taking, on average, 222 days to fill, including 214 that remained vacant for a year or longer. As of December 31, 2019, 78 developments reported 670 vacancies, 371 (55%) of which had been vacant for over 120 days, including 111 apartments vacant for over a year and eight apartments vacant for more than 3 years. At one development, 15 apartments had been vacant for as long as 30 years. The follow-up found HPD made some progress in addressing the problems identified in the initial audit report, but more action is needed. HPD made efforts to simplify data reporting and analysis, improve monitoring of developments, identify developments with consistent delays filling vacancies, and repair uninhabitable apartments, but did not provide documentation to support their review or analysis of vacancy reports or verification of action plans to fill vacant apartments. Of the initial report’s six audit recommendations, one was implemented, four were partially implemented, and one was not implemented.

 

Office of Children and Family Services – Oversight of Adult Protective Services Programs (Follow-Up) (2023-F-6)
The Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS) oversees Adult Protective Services (APS), State-mandated services for adults who, because of a mental or physical impairment, are unable to meet their essential needs, need protection from harm, and have no one available to assist them responsibly. To ensure that APS activities meet State standards, OCFS conducts Practice Reviews (Reviews) of each APS provider and may require a provider to submit a written program improvement plan (PIP). A prior audit report, issued in November 2021, found that OCFS policies and procedures lacked explicit guidance on critical aspects of the Review process, including time frames for conducting Reviews, follow-up with providers regarding deficiencies and PIPs, and documentation of these efforts. Further, progress notes were not always entered into the case files within the required time frame and, thus, may not have captured the most accurate record of events to ensure that clients’ needs were met. The initial audit found the most prevalent case file documentation issues with the
Staten Island field office – issues also identified during OCFS’ 2017 Review. However, OCFS did not follow up on these deficiencies. The follow-up found OCFS made progress with these issues, but improvements are still needed. OCFS worked to improve data relating to APS referrals and APS provider actions and revised policies and procedures to outline required Review activities and designate responsible staff and timelines. However, the new procedures lacked guidance regarding follow-up with APS providers who showed deficiencies after corrective actions had been taken to address PIPs. Of the initial report’s three recommendations, one was implemented and the other two were partially implemented.

 

Homes and Community Renewal – Office of Rent Administration – Collection of Fines Related to Tenant Complaints (Follow-Up) (2023-F-9)
The Office of Rent Administration (ORA), part of Homes and Community Renewal (HCR), administers rent laws and regulations for regulated apartments in the State. Non-compliance and harassment cases filed by rent-regulated tenants that cannot be resolved by settlement, mediation, or conference are heard before an Administrative Law Judge. Owners found to be in violation could face fines of at least $1,000 for each first non-compliance offense and at least $2,000 for each first harassment offense. A prior audit report, issued in December 2019, found ORA lacked proper fiscal controls over fines and settlements, providing limited assurance that all monies due to the State were received and accounted for. ORA was also not exercising its full authority to collect outstanding fines in a more timely manner. While most owners paid their fines, at least $346,000 in fines was outstanding as of
April 10, 2019, including $206,000 in fines and interest dating back to 1995. The follow-up found ORA made progress with addressing these issues, establishing a system to accurately track fines and settlements, improving communication about fines among different divisions and units of HCR, and reinstating a process to refer judgments for collection. However, ORA has not identified a process for tracking repeat offenders, stating another unit within HCR performs that function. ORA has also not enhanced protections for rent-controlled tenants outside NYC, citing legal constraints. Of the initial report’s six recommendations, three were implemented, one was partially implemented, and two were not implemented.

 

###

Editor in Chief Harvey Randall served as Director of Personnel, State University of New York Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor's Office of Employee Relations; Principal Attorney, Counsel's Office, New York State Department of Civil Service; and Colonel, JAG, Command Headquarters, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com