ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED IN COMPOSING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS.

Sep 29, 2026

Plaintiff's filing a timely notice of claim is a condition precedent to the maintenance of an action against a town arising out of the contractual relationship

Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Westchester County Local #860's, [Local 860]'s collective bargaining agreement [CBA] with the Town  provided, among other things, that seniority shall be the determining factor for selection to a vacant position where all other factors are equal. 

Town created a new general foreman position for which two applicants, A and B, applied. Town selected A for the appointment to the position and Local 860, on behalf of B, filed a grievance challenging the Town' appointing A to the position as provided by the relevant provision's set out in the CBA. 

Ultimately the parties proceeded to non-binding arbitration in accordance with provisions set out in the CBA. The arbitrator issued an award in favor of appointing B to the position, which decision was rejected by the Town.

Local 860 brought an action in Supreme Court challenging the Town's decision and Town moved for summary judgment. Supreme Court granted the Town's motion and Local 860 appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.

The Appellate Division affirmed Supreme Court's ruling, explaining:

1. The filing of a notice of claim is a condition precedent to the maintenance of an action against a town arising out of the contractual relationship between a plaintiff and a town and Town Law §65(3) provides that "no action shall be maintained against a town upon or arising out of a contract entered into by the town . . . unless a written verified claim shall have been filed with the town clerk within six months after the cause of action shall have accrued"; 

2. In contrast to other notice statutes, "Town Law §65(3) contains no provision allowing the court to excuse noncompliance with its requirements";

3. An exception to Town Law §65(3)'s notice of claim requirement is only applicable where a plaintiff has pleaded an ongoing or continuing violation, "which the complaint in the instant action did not"; and 

4. As the plaintiffs seek both the recovery of damages and equitable relief, "the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent" to the maintenance of the instant action.

In the words of the Appellate Division, "Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the [Town's] motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint".

Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet.



Sep 28, 2026

On September 28, 2026, GT Weekly's Executive Editor, Noelle Knell, reported

"There’s new IT leadership in New York State following the announcement that CIO Dru Rai has left state service. 

Results reveal an evolving landscape on things like IT strategy, cybersecurity, AI and data management. 

We also checked in with South Carolina CIO Nathan Hogue, who shared that the state is now tracking 250 AI use cases. 

Meanwhile in Washington State, a new CISO has been named. 

Finally, while AI threats to cybersecurity have been dominating headlines, ransomware remains alive and well."


Owner of Ulster County medical transportation company sentenced to prison for stealing $1.1 million in Medicare fraud scheme

On September 25, 2026, New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli and Ulster County District Attorney Emmanuel C. Nneji announced the owner of an Ulster County medical transportation service company today was sentenced to serve three to nine years in state prison and ordered to pay full restitution for stealing over $1.1 million by unlawfully billing the Medicaid program by inflating charges and billing for services that were never provided.

Muhammad W. Khan, 31, the owner of MAK Limo, pleaded guilty in March to grand larceny in Ulster County Court before Judge Bryan Rounds.

“Muhammad Khan falsified bills and bribed patients to deprive the Medicaid program of over a million dollars, taking money that should have rightly been spent on healthcare for New Yorkers,” DiNapoli said. “I thank Ulster County District Attorney Nneji for his partnership on this case and in fighting public fraud.”

“This huge theft scheme was uncovered, and the perpetrators brought to justice, by the tenacious and collaborative efforts of the investigators and lawyers dedicated to the case,” Nneji said. “I am grateful to Comptroller DiNapoli for his commitment to holding these operations accountable and recovering public funds stolen by the defendant.”

Under the Medicaid program, patients may use transportation services to go to legitimate medical appointments. Providers then bill the Medicaid program. Group rides are not allowed without prior authorization, and approved providers can only bill for mileage once for a group.

As part of the joint investigation, investigators found the defendant systematically billed the Medicaid program individually for rides that were actually group rides and for rides that never occurred. The investigation also found patients were paid kickbacks to use MAK Limo’s services and facilitate the fraud. The crimes occurred from November 2020 to August 2024.

Khan was arrested in June 2025 along with his father, Mohammad A. Khan, 69, the owner of Atlas Limo. Both companies were enrolled in the Medicaid program and received over $5.8 million dollars in Medicaid payments from New York state.

Mohammad A. Khan was charged with grand larceny in the second degree. He was accused of stealing $111,548.

Since taking office in 2007, DiNapoli has committed to fighting public corruption and encourages the public to help fight fraud and abuse. New Yorkers can report allegations of fraud involving taxpayer money by calling the toll-free Fraud Hotline at 1-888-672-4555, by filing a complaint online at https://www.osc.ny.gov/investigations, or by mailing a complaint to: Office of the State Comptroller, Division of Investigations, 8th Floor, 110 State St., Albany, NY 12236.

###


Sep 26, 2026

Selected items posted on the Internet during the week ending September 25, 2026

Automate Social Service Eligibility Verifications with Instant Results Automated verification solutions help agencies adapt to H.R. 1 without increasing administrative paperwork. Learn More

Making AI work today Discover where AI is delivering results, with examples from agencies. Get your free pass

Leveraging AI for IT & Security Operations Only 7% of orgs have AI security in practice. The other 93%? Start here. Download the eBook

Drawing on real-world examples from states and cities Explore how policymakers can build safeguards that keep pace with rapidly evolving technology.  DOWNLOAD

How the Philadelphia Water Department Builds Trust and Drives Action  Philadelphia Water Department used targeted, data-driven communications to increase resident engagement, improve service delivery and build trust around critical water infrastructure projects. READ NOW

Keeping Public Services Accessible During Emergencies Power outages, severe weather, and equipment failures don't stop the need for public services. Learn how agencies can prepare for unexpected disruptions while maintaining reliable communications with staff and the communities they serve. DOWNLOAD

Prepare Your Agency for New H.R. 1 Eligibility Requirements Bridge system gaps with automated tools that deliver fast, seamless verifications for agency compliance. Learn More

A Nationwide Study of Truck Parking on Interstate Ramps Every night, hundreds of trucks park on interstate ramps. This report maps where and why ramp parking occurs and what it means for corridor planning, safety, and funding strategy. DOWNLOAD

Working to control the dangers of AI. Below are some of the players and the efforts being considered:

  1. www.gsb.stanford.edu › insights › blueprint-keeping A Blueprint for Keeping Humans in Control of AI Sep 10, 2026 · Stanford GSB researchers are building frameworks that keep AI under human control even as they become more autonomous. In a cooperative game, an AI agent learns when to check in with a person and when to act alone.

  2. controlai.org Superintelligent AI: An Extinction Risk to Humanity | ControlAI With Superintelligent AI, the risks of unsafe development, deployment, or misuse could be catastrophic—even existential—as digital intelligence surpasses human capabilities.

  3. cacm.acm.org › blogcacm › controlling-ai Controlling AI – Communications of the ACM Oct 1, 2023 · Earlier this week, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak explicitly called for a CERN for AI, as well something like an IAEA for AI, all very much in line with what I and others have hoped for.

  4. www.technologyreview.com › 2023/05/22 › 1073482 Our quick guide to the 6 ways we can regulate AI | MIT ... May 22, 2023 · We’ve analyzed six different international attempts to regulate artificial intelligence, set out the pros and cons of each, and given them a rough score indicating how influential we think... Author: Melissa Heikkilä

  5. www.weforum.org › stories › artificial-intelligence The oversight paradox: Human control over AI may be eroding Jul 2, 2026 · AI requires human oversight, but the practice that requires is eroding. Here's why keeping humans in the governance loop will be key to governing AI well.

  6. tech.yahoo.com › ai › articles Microsoft’s AI CEO says ‘controlling’ AI ‘is going to be a ... Sep 19, 2026 · "We should not create something that we can't control," Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman said.

  7. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › AI_capability_control AI capability control - Wikipedia Capability control, such as a "kill switch," becomes less effective as agents become more intelligent and their ability to exploit flaws in human control systems increases.





Sep 25, 2026

Employer served disciplinary charges on an Employee after Employee placed a racially inflammatory message on the Employee's Facebook page

In this CPLR Article 75* seeking to vacate a determination of a hearing officer made pursuant to Education Law §3020-a, Plaintiff appealed the Supreme Court's denying Plaintiff's petition.

Plaintiff, a tenured employee, was served with disciplinary charges alleging Employee posted a racially inflammatory message on Employee's Facebook page  which resulted in the School District [Employer] charging Plaintiff with misconduct and insubordination. Following an Education Law §3020-a disciplinary hearing, the hearing officer issued a determination sustained the charges and found that the appropriate penalty was termination of Plaintiff's employment.

Plaintiff commenced the instant CPLR Article 75 in Supreme Court seeking a court order vacating hearing officer's determination. Supreme Court denied the petition and the petitioner appealed.

The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, noting that:

1. "Where, as here, the obligation to arbitrate arises through statutory mandate ... the arbitrator's determination is subject to closer judicial scrutiny than it would receive had the arbitration been conducted voluntarily";

2. "An award in a compulsory arbitration proceeding must have evidentiary support and cannot be arbitrary and capricious";

3.  An "article 75 review questions whether the decision was rational or had a plausible basis"; and

4. In the event the evidence submitted may be interpreted in more than one way, "this Court must 'accept the arbitrator['s] credibility determinations, even where there is conflicting evidence and room for choice exists'".

The Appellate Division found that the hearing officer's determination had evidentiary support and was not arbitrary and capricious and appropriately credited the testimony of the different witnesses, and "there is no cause to disturb the hearing officer's credibility determinations without improperly substituting judgment".

Noting that "A court may set aside an administrative penalty only if "it is so  disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness", the fact that "reasonable minds might disagree over what the proper penalty should have been does not provide a basis for . . . refashioning the penalty". 

Further, the Appellate Division said that "The question of whether the penalty is so disproportionate to the misconduct as to shock the conscience requires a case-by-case factual analysis" and concluded that "in light of the totality of the circumstances, including the adverse impact of the racially charged posting on the school and the community, the penalty of termination of employment is not irrational and does not shock the conscience".

Accordingly, the Appellate Division held that "Supreme Court properly denied the petition".

* Supreme Court incorrectly cited CPLR Article 78 instead of CPLR Article 75, which is the standard of review mandated by Education Law §3020-a(5)(a). Nevertheless, applying the proper standard, which was briefed by the parties, the Appellate Division affirmed.

Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet.


Sep 24, 2026

New York State's Comptroller posts municipal Fiscal Stress Monitoring System scores

On September 24, 2026 New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli reported that a total of 22 local governments in New York state were designated in fiscal stress for their local fiscal years ending (FYE) in 2025, down from 23 a year ago.

However, the number of municipalities in the most severe category, significant fiscal stress, increased from four to six, according to the report issued by Comptroller DiNapoli. 

These designations are based on the Comptroller’s Fiscal Stress Monitoring System (FSMS) scores.

Click HERE to access the Comptroller's Press Release concerning New York State local governments found to be in fiscal stress posted on the Internet.


Nearly $107 million in unclaimed funds reported awaiting being returned to rightful owners in Orange County by New State's State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli

"Unclaimed funds" is money that has been lost or forgotten over time. This includes old bank accounts, uncashed checks, stock certificates and unused gift cards among other funds held by businesses and organizations. After a period of time, such "unclaimed funds" is considered abandoned property, and turned over to the New York State Comptroller’s office in accordance with New York State's Abandoned Property Law.

New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli and State Senator James Skoufis joined local officials to highlight the return of $16,035.31 to the Town of Wallkill's Emergency Medical Services and raise awareness of the nearly $107 million dollars in unclaimed funds awaiting being claimed by Orange County residents, governmental entities, business and nonprofit organizations.

The Town of Wallkill EMS had been unable to access several insurance payments and checks it never received, which were eventually turned over to the DiNapoli’s Office of Unclaimed Funds. With the help of Skoufis’ office, the Town of Wallkill's EMS unit was able to recover more than $16,000 owed to the organization.

“Unclaimed funds belong in the hands of their rightful owners, and I am pleased we were able to return more than $16,000 to the Town of Wallkill EMS to support its critical work,” said DiNapoli. “I thank Senator Skoufis for helping connect the corps with my Office of Unclaimed Funds, and I encourage every New Yorker, business and organization to search our free online database to see if they have money waiting for them.”

“The Town of Wallkill EMS provides a critical service to the community,” said Skoufis. “They not only cover their own service area, but provide significant mutual aid to surrounding areas, and they need and deserve all our support. I’m thrilled they received their money, and that my office was helpful in connecting them with the Comptroller’s Office of Unclaimed Funds. This is government working in tandem for the common good.”

"Making my constituents aware of unclaimed funds has been an incredibly rewarding aspect of my constituent outreach over the past two years, and Comptroller DiNapoli’s office has been essential in organizing the many unclaimed funds events I’ve held,” said Assemblymember Paula Elaine Kay. “This money belongs to the people and it’s important we use our positions to elevate the accessibility of these funds. The $16,000 that the Wallkill Emergency Medical Service has recovered will go a long way in supporting their life saving operations in Orange County, so thank you to Senator Skoufis and Comptroller DiNapoli for their help in facilitating this recovery. If you haven’t already, I encourage all of my constituents to search through the Comptroller’s website to see if you are entitled to unclaimed funds; you never know what could come back."

“As an emergency services organization, we need resources to function safely, treat patients, and save lives,” said Alexandria Morrice, Executive Director, Town of Wallkill EMS. “Our service area is large and our call volume is high, so equipment, supplies, training, and support are always in demand, and $16,035.32 goes a long way. We’re grateful to Senator Skoufis’ office for facilitating the assistance and to the Comptroller’s Office of Unclaimed Funds for helping us access our money and getting it returned quickly to our accounts. These funds are being used to upgrade ALS equipment on each of our ambulances and fly cars." 

In Orange County, $106,801,944.89 in unclaimed funds is currently waiting to be claimed across 629,862 accounts. During State Fiscal Year 2025–26, DiNapoli’s office returned $2,761,974 in unclaimed funds to Orange County residents.

To return money even faster, DiNapoli launched the Expedited Payment Program in 2025. It sends certain unclaimed funds up to $5,000 to verified individuals in the mail without having to file a claim. Before a check is issued, the Comptroller’s office sends a notification letter.

In Orange County, $1,046,412 has been sent to residents through 6,496 expedited-payment checks. Since the program’s launch in 2025, more than 300,000 expedited-payment checks totaling more than $73 million have been mailed statewide, with an average check amount of $225.

DiNapoli’s Office of Unclaimed Funds returns over $2 million each day. Unclaimed funds never expire and are free to claim through the Comptroller’s website.

Individuals, organizations, businesses and other entities can search for and claim their funds at any time:

Online: osc.ny.gov/unclaimed-funds

By phone: (800) 221-9311, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

In person: at outreach events held across the state.

A map of unclaimed funds owed to New Yorkers by county and region is available here.

###



Editor in Chief Harvey Randall served as Director of Personnel, State University of New York Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor's Office of Employee Relations; Principal Attorney, Counsel's Office, New York State Department of Civil Service; and Colonel, JAG, Command Headquarters, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com