ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED IN COMPOSING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS.

Mar 12, 2026

Employee's making misleading entries into agency records and other acts of insubordination results in disciplinary action

New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings' Administrative Law Judge [ALJ] Astrid B. Gloade recommended a 22-day suspension without pay as the penalty to be imposed on an agency employee [Respondent] charged with, and found guilty of, insubordination and making a false, deceptive, and misleading entry into an agency record. 

After being directed not to do so, Respondent worked on and sent emails concerning matters not assigned to her and copied the agency's Commissioner and the agency's Deputy Commissioner on routine work emails. Respondent also submitted a request to the agency's Office of Information Technology [OIT] service desk for assistance on behalf of the Commissioner without the Commissioner's knowledge or approval in an effort to restore Respondent's access to an agency database. 

The ALJ found that Respondent willfully disobeyed Respondent's supervisor’s clear and unambiguous instructions that Respondent:

[1] not send emails regarding issues not assigned to her, and, in addition, 

[2] not to send emails addressed to individuals outside Respondent's chain of command. 

Judge Gloade also found that Respondent made a false entry in agency records when she submitted an OIT ticket "on the Commissioner’s behalf" without authorization and misrepresented that she sent the request on the Commissioner’s behalf. 

The ALJ recommended Respondent be suspended for 22 days without pay, noting the recommended penalty was coupled with a 15-day prehearing suspension that Respondent had already served. 

Click HERE to access Judge Gloade's findings and recommended penalty posted on the Internet.


Editor in Chief Harvey Randall served as Director of Personnel, State University of New York Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor's Office of Employee Relations; Principal Attorney, Counsel's Office, New York State Department of Civil Service; and Colonel, JAG, Command Headquarters, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com