ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED IN COMPOSING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS.

Apr 9, 2026

Audits of BOCES, school districts and municipalities posted on the Internet

Audits of municipalities, BOCES and school districts listed below were posted on the Internet by New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli on April 8, 2026.

Click on the text highlighted in color to access these audits.


East Norwich Volunteer Fire Company – Fuel Monitoring (Nassau County)  Auditors found that company officials did not properly monitor fuel inventory for loss, waste or misuse. Officials did not accurately record fuel deliveries and usage, review fuel records in a timely manner or perform periodic reconciliations. As a result, 2,936 gallons of fuel, costing $7,603 were not accounted for. Officials also did not verify the accuracy of fuel purchased, ensure records were complete and accurate or reconcile fuel records to confirm proper usage. Discrepancies included 1,128 gallons not recorded, incorrect documentation of vehicle and driver IDs and missing odometer readings.


City of Ithaca – Records and Reports (Tompkins County)  Although transactions recorded in the accounting records and reports auditors reviewed were generally accurate, city officials did not maintain complete and timely accounting records and reports. In addition, the city controller’s office did not prepare or provide the council with monthly financial reports, such as budget-to-actual comparisons, cash balances or fund balance estimates, and the city manager did not provide year-end financial reports to the council. Auditors found that over 4,000 transactions totaling approximately $10 million were not recorded in a timely manner and council-authorized budget adjustments exceeding $1 million were omitted. In addition, bank reconciliations for accounts totaling approximately $51 million were not completed timely.


Town of Cato – Supervisor’s Records and Reports (Cayuga County)  The supervisor did not maintain complete, accurate and up-to-date accounting records and reports. Auditors found that the board lacked reliable financial information to effectively manage the town’s operations, increasing the risk of theft, waste and abuse. The supervisor assigned his duties of accounting records and preparing disbursements and financial reports to an appointed bookkeeper without providing oversight, which resulted in errors, including $348,817 in receipts and $744,572 in disbursements that went unrecorded and were not reported to the board. Bank reconciliations were inadequate, monthly financial reports were incomplete and inaccurate and payroll certification was insufficient, causing overpayments totaling at least $2,600. Additionally, the supervisor did not file the town’s annual financial report (AFR) with DiNapoli’s office, as required by state law, since 2017. While the bookkeeper filed the 2017 AFR in 2022, the others remain unfiled.


Cincinnatus Fire Department – Financial Management (Cortland County)  Department officials did not ensure financial activities were properly recorded or supported and funds were not adequately safeguarded. Because the department has four subdivisions, each with its own treasurer, there is an increased risk of department funds being lost or misused. Treasurers’ records were incomplete, with deposits and disbursements not matching bank statements and six bank accounts lacking any accounting records. One additional account had an accounting ledger that recorded deposits but not disbursements. In addition, hundreds of disbursements and collections lacked supporting documentation or approval.


Monroe 2-Orleans BOCES – MiFi Usage Billings (Monroe County)  The assistant superintendent did not properly monitor and manage MiFi usage billings, resulting in approximately $28,800 in unnecessary service charges for 62 devices. Officials also did not provide timely or accurate information to component school districts, limiting their ability to manage these devices. As a result, many devices were inactive or unnecessary yet continued to generate charges.


Town of Brant – Transparency of Fiscal Activities (Erie County)  The board did not conduct or provide for an annual audit of the supervisor’s financial records and reports for fiscal year 2024 in accordance with state law. The supervisor also did not prepare and file the required 2022 through 2024 AFRs with DiNapoli’s office. Furthermore, the supervisor did not provide the board with complete, accurate and reliable monthly financial reports, which prevented the board from effectively monitoring the town’s financial position and available fund balance to make informed decisions.


Truxton Fire District – Audit Follow-Up (Cortland County)  The review assessed the Truxton Fire District’s progress in implementing recommendations in the audit Truxton Fire District – Board Oversight, released in November 2022. The audit determined that district officials did not provide adequate oversight of district financial activities and did not complete mandatory fiscal oversight training. To help officials improve their oversight of financial activities and to complete the mandatory fiscal oversight training, the audit contained 11 recommendations. The board fully implemented one recommendation, partially implemented four, did not implement five, and one was no longer applicable.


Chittenango Central School District – Audit Follow-Up (Madison/Onondaga Counties)  The review was to assess the Chittenango Central School District’s progress in implementing recommendations in the audit Chittenango Central School District – Information Technologyreleased in March 2024. The audit determined that district officials did not adequately manage nonstudent network and local user account access and develop an information technology (IT) contingency plan. To help officials improve their oversight of user account access and develop a contingency plan, the audit contained four recommendations. The board, district officials and the director of technology partially implemented two recommendations and did not implement two recommendations. Auditors also reviewed the district’s progress in implementing recommendations related to the sensitive IT control weaknesses and communicated those results confidentially to officials.

###

Editor in Chief Harvey Randall served as Director of Personnel, State University of New York Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor's Office of Employee Relations; Principal Attorney, Counsel's Office, New York State Department of Civil Service; and Colonel, JAG, Command Headquarters, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com