The Long Beach Professional Fire Fighters Association [Union] and the City
of Long Beach [City] entered into a collective bargaining agreement [CBA] covering
the period from July 1, 2004, through June 30, 2010, and thereafter continued
pursuant to the Triborough Law, Civil Service Law § 209-a[1][e].* Firefighters
and any municipal employees assigned to the fire department were covered by the
CBA.
City appointed several
paramedics, and unilaterally set their terms of employment. Union
filed a grievance and, when the grievance was denied, filed a demand for
arbitration. City's efforts to stay the arbitration with respect to Union's
grievance as related to the paramedics were unsuccessful.**
Ultimately the arbitrator issued an award determining that City violated
certain provisions of the CBA when it set contrary terms and conditions of the
paramedics' employment. Union commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article
75 to confirm the arbitration award while City cross-moved pursuant to CPLR
7502(a)(iii) to dismiss the petition or, in the alternative, to reassign the
petition to the Justice who presided over the prior proceeding, and to vacate
the arbitration award.
Supreme Court granted the Union's petition to confirm the
award and denied the City's cross-motion. The City appealed.
The Appellate Division, noting that "Judicial review of arbitration
awards is extremely limited", said a court may vacate an arbitrator's
award that "violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly
exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power, citing
(Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v Transport Workers' Union
of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, and other decisions. Additionally,
the Appellate Division opined "an award may be vacated where 'it exhibits
a 'manifest disregard of law'" and the burden is on the movant to
establish grounds for vacatur by clear and convincing evidence.
Finding that the City failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence
that the arbitration award should be vacated on the grounds that [1] it was
irrational; [2] exhibited a manifest disregard of the law; [3] that the arbitrator had
engaged in misconduct or [4] that the award violated public policy, held that Supreme
Court had properly granted Union's petition to confirm the arbitration award
and had properly denied the City's cross-motion to vacate the award.
* See
Matter of Professional Staff Congress-City Univ. of N.Y. v
New York State Pub. Empl. Relations Bd., 7 NY3d 458).
** See Matter of City of Long Beach v Long Beach Professional
Fire Fighters Assn., Local 287, 161 AD3d 855.
Click HERE
to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet.