ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN PREPARING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Aug 7, 2023

From the Blogs: GovTech Today's postings on August 7, 2023

GovTech Today's postings on August 7, 2023, included the following items:

Why Should Young People Work in Government IT? On the record: State technology leaders share their pitches to get fresh faces into state and local government IT shops. READ MORE

The Hidden Costs of Robotic Process Automation in Government Robotic process automation is increasingly popular as a way to speed up government work. But this isn't always the answer — and at times, it may cause an agency unforeseen headaches down the road. READ MORE

Administrative Law Judge recommended termination of Correction Officer found guilty of failing to report for duty on numerous occasions and certain other acts of misconduct

New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings Administrative Law Judge Julia H. Lee recommended termination of employment for a New York City Correction Officer [Officer] found guilty of certain charges of failing to report for duty and being absent without leave on numerous occasions.

Judge Lee found Officer had repeatedly refused lawful orders to work overtime, arrived late to work on over 200 dates, and failed to perform her duties in a timely and efficient manner.

Officer did not deny the time and leave violations but contended that being ordered to work beyond her regular hours damaged her health and well-being. The ALJ rejected this argument, finding that Officer’s health concerns were not a defense and did not amount to a medical emergency under the health and safety exception to the “obey now/grieve later” principle.

Although the charges served on Officer were sustained in part and were dismissed in part, and the fact that Officer had no prior disciplinary history, Judge Lee recommended Officer's termination, opining that dismissal was warranted due to the number of violations and the officer’s unwillingness to accept responsibility for her those acts of misconduct for which the ALJ found her guilty.

Click HERE to access Judge Lee's decision and recommendation posted on the Internet.

 

Aug 4, 2023

Probationary teacher denied tenure following two extensions of her probationary period

The New York City Department of Education [DOE] appointed an individual [Plaintiff] as an educator effective March 2014 subject to the satisfactory completion of a three-year probationary period. In January 2017, Plaintiff agreed an extension of her probationary period for another year, "in order to give her more time to develop additional evidence in support of a grant of tenure" in lieu of termination.

During the 2017-2018 school year Plaintiff received an unsatisfactory observation rating and a disciplinary "letter to file." In January 2018, Plaintiff again agreed to extend her probationary service for another year, again in lieu of termination. 

During the 2018-2019 school year Plaintiff received two more "letters to file" and in January 2019 DOE denied Plaintiff a certification of satisfactory completion of probation and discontinued her employment as a probationary teacher. 

Petitioner commenced a CPLR Article 78 procedure seeking a review the DOE's dismissing her from her employment as a probationary teacher. Supreme Court denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding and Plaintiff appealed the Supreme Court's decision.

Citing Matter of Feinerman v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs. of Nassau County, 48 NY2d 491, the Appellate Division sustained the Supreme Court's ruling, explaining that that contrary to argument that she "had acquired the right to a hearing pursuant to  Education Law §3020-a with respect to the discontinuation of her probationary employment pursuant to the terms of the relevant collective bargaining agreement [CBA], the record shows that:

1. Plaintiff "freely, knowingly, and voluntarily waived her rights to tenure;

2. DOE "did not coerce or place Plaintiff under duress to induce her to sign the probation extension agreements;" and

3. Although Plaintiff contended that she had acquired the right to a hearing under Education Law §3020-a upon discontinuation of her probationary employment pursuant to the terms of the relevant CBA, the record indicated that Plaintiff failed to file a grievance pursuant to the procedure set forth in the CBA to dispute DOE's failure to  provide her with a Education Law §3020-a hearing.

Further, the Appellate Division opined that a probationary teacher "may be terminated during his or her probationary period for any reason, or no reason at all, and without a hearing, unless the teacher establishes that his or her employment was terminated for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, in violation of a statutory proscription, or in bad faith." In any event, said the court, "The [Plaintiff] bears the burden of establishing bad faith or illegal reasons by competent evidence".

Noting that the evidence demonstrated that the Plaintiff "received multiple letters to file, that she received an unsatisfactory observation rating, and that she lacked professionalism during her probationary employment", the Appellate Division concluded that such evidence demonstrated that the DOE's decision denying Plaintiff a grant of tenure and discontinuing her probationary employment was made in good faith and that DOE's determination was rationally based and not arbitrary and capricious. 

Thus, said the court, Supreme Court "properly, inter alia, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding".

Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet.

 

Aug 3, 2023

Recent posts on the Internet concerning the use of Artificial Intelligence [A.I.] in a government setting

 Click on the text in color to access the item described.

The City of San Jose, California, has joined a growing number of cities addressing generative AI tools, doing so with a set of new guidelines for using the tech, which city officials consider a living document. 

What Does Generative AI Mean for the Justice System? (Part 1)

What Does Generative AI Mean for the Justice System? (Part 2)

AI in Action: Who’s Leading the Way in Generative AI 

 

N.B. As NYPPL's masthead notes "Artificial Intelligence [A.I.] is not used, in whole or in part, in the preparation of summaries of judicial and quasi-judicial decisions posted on the Internet by NYPPL."

 

Paid Parental Leave for PEF Employees of the State as the employer

The New York State Department of Civil Service has published the following Attendance and Leave Bulletin:

 Policy Bulletin 2023-03, Paid Parental Leave for PEF Employees

The text of Policy Bulletin 2023-03 is posted on the Internet at:
https://www.cs.ny.gov/attendance_leave/PolBull23-03.cfm

For those wishing to print Policy Bulletin 2023-03, the Department offers a PDF version on the Internet at: https://www.cs.ny.gov/attendance_leave/PB2023-03.pdf

To view previous Attendance and Leave bulletins issued by the Department of Civil Service, visit: https://www.cs.ny.gov/attendance_leave/index.cfm


Exchanging sexually-explicit text messages with individuals while on duty held to constitute misconduct within the meaning of Civil Service Law §75

In accordance with Civil Service Law §75, the Appointing Authority [Respondent] notified an employee [Petitioner] that he was charged with two specifications of misconduct.

Specification 1 alleged that, during a period of time when Petitioner was on duty, "[Petitioner] failed to devote all of [his] time and attention to the performance of [his] duties in violation of [certain provisions set out in the Respondent's] Employees' Manual...."

Specification 2 alleged that during that same time period, "[Petitioner] failed to model appropriate conduct, ethics, and performance ... in violation of [certain provisions set out in the Respondent's] Employees' Manual ...."

Petitioner denied the allegations and a Civil Service Law §75(2) disciplinary hearing was conducted. At the conclusion of the hearing the Hearing Officer issued a determination finding Petitioner guilty of both Specifications and recommended that Petitioner be dismissed from service. Respondent adopted the Hearing Officer's findings and recommendation as to the penalty to be imposed and dismissed Petitioner from service. 

Petitioner then commenced a CPLR Article 78 proceeding in Supreme Court seeking a court order annulling the Respondent's determination on the grounds that [1] the record lacked substantial evidence to support the findings that he engaged in misconduct and [2] that the penalty of termination was disproportionate to the offenses alleged. Supreme Court transferred the matter to the Appellate Division.

Addressing the penalty imposed on Petitioner, the Appellate Division, noted that the Petitioner's record established that Petitioner consistently received "strong evaluations for his work performance" and that Petitioner had "expressed remorse and that he was not proud of his conduct." Citing Matter of Gulotta v New York State Thruway Auth., 174 AD3d 1205, the majority of the court, Lynch, J. dissenting, opined that the penalty of termination "is so disproportionate to the offense and shockingly unfair as to constitute an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" under the circumstances.* 

The Appellate Division, "annulling so much [of the Respondent's decision] as imposed a penalty of termination," remitted the matter to the Respondent for the Respondent "to consider imposing a less severe penalty" on Petitioner.

Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet.

* A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances - a 442-page volume focusing on determining an appropriate disciplinary penalty to be imposed on an officer or employee in the public service in instances where the individual has been found guilty of misconduct or incompetence. Click HERE for more information. 

 

Aug 2, 2023

Claimant for Workers' Compensation benefits has the burden of establishing a causal connection between his alleged psychological injury and his employment

A train conductor [Claimant] for a self-insured employer filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits. Claimant alleged that notwithstanding his high-risk of exposure to the COVID-19 coronavirus and an unsafe work environment, he was not provided with adequate personal protective equipment by his employer. This, Claimant contended, resulted in anxiety and his preexisting psychiatric conditions were exacerbated. The employer controverted the claim.

A Workers' Compensation Law Judge [WCLJ] disallowed the claim, finding that the stress that Claimant was under was the same as other similarly situated workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Workers' Compensation Board affirmed the WCLJ's decision.* Claimant appealed the Board's ruling.

The Appellate Division sustained the Board's determination. Citing  Matter of Novak v St. Luke's Roosevelt Hosp., 148 AD3d 1509, the court, noting "[it] is well settled that a mental injury arising from work-related stress is compensable", pointed out that in order to receive benefits the claimant has the "burden of establishing, by competent medical evidence, that a causal connection exist[s] between [his or] her [psychological injury] and [his or] her employment".** However, opined the court, "[for] a mental injury premised on work-related stress to be compensable, a claimant must demonstrate that the stress that caused the claimed mental injury was greater than that which other similarly situated workers experienced in the normal work environment".

The question of whether the stress experienced by a claimant is more than that normally encountered is a factual question for the Board to resolve, and its finding will not be disturbed by the court when supported by substantial evidence and courts "defer to the Board's credibility assessments".

Finding that substantial evidence supported the Board's factual finding that neither "Claimant's fear of contracting COVID-19," which the Board concluded was "a fear likely experienced by all [t]rain [c]onductors in March of 2020," nor his work environment and duties "resulted in stress greater than that experienced by similarly situated train operators during the pandemic," as "exposure to COVID-19 was a risk being experienced by all train conductors in March 2020 as part of their normal duties".

The Appellate Division also noted that Claimant's reliance on cases involving infectious diseases contracted at work was misplaced "as he did not contract COVID-19 at work."

* The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded the WCLJ's finding to the extent that it was premised on a determination that claimant was an "essential worker," finding that it had no bearing on his claim for workers' compensation benefits. 

** See Matter of Issayou v Issayuou Inc., 174 AD3d 1277.

Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet. 

See, also, Matter of Djanuzakov v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth. posted on the Internet at https://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2023/2023_03893.htm and In the Matter of the Claim of Tracey Brown, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent. Workers' Compensation, posted on the Internet at https://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2023/2023_03888.htm .


Aug 1, 2023

Inside Higher Education's free comprehensive resource addressing the Supreme Court's landmark affirmative action ruling available for "downloading"

On August 1, 2023, Inside Higher Ed announced it free booklet, "The Ruling Explained: The Future of Affirmative Action in Higher Education, which it  described  as "a comprehensive resource comprised of articles and essays covering and responding to the Supreme Court's landmark ruling against affirmative action."

Click the box below to obtain a copy of this booklet:

Download Today »
Inside Higher Ed  reports the articles contained in this booklet explore:
  • The immediate impact of the decision on college admissions
  • The ongoing debate on whether the decision extends to financial aid, potentially affecting a broader range of colleges
  • The strategies being considered by colleges to attract diverse students without giving preferential treatment to minority applicants
  • The possibility of colleges admitting more transfer students from community colleges as a direct result of the ruling
  • The examination of whether colleges with legacy admissions programs, which predominantly benefit white applicants by favoring the children of alumni, will choose to eliminate such programs

New York State Comptroller DiNapoli releases audits

New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli announced the following audits and reports were issued on July 31 2023.

Click on the text highlighted in color to access the entire audit report.

 

State Education Department (Preschool Special Education Audit Initiative) – Step Up Therapy Services, PLLC – Compliance With the Reimbursable Cost Manual (2021-S-31)

Step Up, a New York City-based not-for-profit organization, is approved by the State Education Department to provide preschool special education itinerant teacher services to children with disabilities who are between the ages of three and five years. For the three fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, Step Up reported approximately $7.4 million in reimbursable costs for the SED preschool cost-based program. Auditors identified $810,382 in reported costs that did not comply with requirements.

 

Department of Health – Improper Supplemental Maternity Capitation Payments to Managed Care Organizations (Follow-Up) (2023-F-3)

Many of the State’s Medicaid recipients receive their services through managed care, whereby the Department of Health (DOH) pays managed care organizations (MCOs) a monthly premium for each enrolled recipient and, in turn, the MCOs pay for services their members require. In addition to the monthly premiums, MCOs can receive a one-time Supplemental Maternity Capitation Payment (SMCP) for the prenatal and postpartum physician care and hospital or birthing center delivery costs associated with the maternity care of a recipient. MCOs are not eligible to receive SMCPs for maternity cases that end in termination or a miscarriage, as these are considered reimbursed to the MCO through the monthly premium for the recipient, and must submit encounter claim data as evidence of the delivery and any other inpatient and outpatient maternity services provided.

A prior audit report, issued in November 2021, found about $55 million in improper and questionable SMCPs to MCOs. Auditors also determined DOH’s eMedNY claims processing system did not have access to maternity encounter data to verify that SMCP claims were eligible for reimbursement. Instead, DOH relied on audits by the Office of the Medicaid Inspector General (OMIG) to identify and recoup inappropriate SMCPs. However, auditors found OMIG was not performing these audits in a timely manner and the audits did not capture all improper SMCPs.

The follow-up found that DOH made some progress in addressing the problems identified in the initial audit report, but additional actions are still required. For example, a significant portion of the questionable claims identified have not been reviewed, and DOH has not followed up with the 10 MCOs identified in the initial audit to ensure issues with their claims processing systems were resolved. Of the initial report’s six audit recommendations, three were partially implemented, and three were not implemented.

 

Metropolitan Transportation Authority – Fare Evasion (Follow-Up) (2022-F-23)

For 2018, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) reported a total of $225 million in revenue loss due to fare evasion at New York City Transit (Transit) and MTA Bus. Among other actions, the MTA launched the Fare Enforcement and Worker Safety Program (Program) to deter fare evasion. A prior report, issued in April 2021, found that the MTA did not provide assurance that the Program was effective in achieving its goal of reducing annual fare evasion losses below 2017 levels ($150 million). Instead, Transit estimated that it lost more than $300 million to fare evasion in 2019. Since the initial report was issued, the subway and bus fare evasion rates have increased. The first quarter of 2023 (January–March) saw an increase of 11.1% (± 0.9%) for subways and an estimated increase of 37.6% for buses. After the audit’s release, the MTA created a Blue-Ribbon Panel to reduce fare evasion across the MTA system. On May 17, 2023, the panel released its report, which incorporates several of the recommendations of the initial audit report. The follow-up found that the MTA made progress in addressing the issues identified in the initial audit. Of the initial report’s 19 audit recommendations, 13 were implemented, four were partially implemented, one was not implemented, and one is no longer applicable.

 

State Board of Elections – Use of Federal Funding for Election Technology and Security (Follow-Up) (2022-F-35)

The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) was enacted to help reform the nation’s voting process. In June 2018, the Board of Elections (BOE) received $19.5 million in HAVA funding to improve and enhance election administration, technology, and security, including $3.3 million that it designated to reimburse County Boards for their remediation activities. A prior audit, issued in September 2021, found the BOE utilized HAVA funding appropriately. However, of the 57 County Boards, only seven had submitted claims for reimbursement, showing that they had moved forward with the needed security measures. The follow-up found that BOE has made significant progress addressing the issues identified, having implemented the one recommendation from the initial report to ensure County Boards take the necessary action to improve security.

 

New York City Department of Buildings – Oversight of Sidewalk Sheds (Follow-Up) (2022-F-36)

The New York City Department of Buildings (DOB) is responsible for regulating the safe and lawful use of more than 1 million buildings and construction sites in the city, including sidewalk sheds (sheds) – temporary structures installed and maintained to protect people and property on city sidewalks during the construction, demolition, and maintenance of buildings. A prior audit report, issued in July 2021, found that DOB was not adequately overseeing and monitoring the timely installation and removal of sheds or ensuring that sheds were properly maintained. For example, the audit found unsafe façades with no installed sheds, sheds with hazardous conditions, and sheds without valid operating permits. The follow-up found that DOB has made limited progress in addressing the problems identified in the initial audit. Of the initial report’s 15 recommendations, four were implemented, two were partially implemented, and nine were not implemented.

 

Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services – Cyber Incident Response Team (Follow-Up) (2023-F-8)

In 2017, the Cyber Incident Response Team (CIRT) was created within the Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services (DHSES) to provide cybersecurity support to more than 2,800 non-Executive agencies, local governments, and public authorities in New York. A prior audit report, issued in November 2021, found that CIRT developed lines of service to guide its work – cyber incident response services, technical cyber services, and information sharing and outreach – but did not establish specific and measurable objectives or quantifiable goals that could be measured to evaluate its accomplishments. The follow-up found that DHSES made progress in addressing the issues identified in the initial audit report; however, additional actions are needed. Of the initial report’s two audit recommendations, one was implemented and one was partially implemented.

 

New York State Health Insurance Program – UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company of New York: Improper Payments for Acupuncture and Acupuncture-Related Services (Follow-Up) (2023-F-14)

The Department of Civil Service (Civil Service) contracts with UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company of New York (United) to administer the Empire Plan’s medical/surgical benefits, including acupuncture and acupuncture-related services such as heat and massage therapy. A prior audit report, issued in October 2021, identified $7.3 million in actual and potential overpayments for services that were not supported by provider documentation and for duplicate payments. The follow-up found that United made minimal progress in addressing the issues identified in the initial audit. At the time of the follow-up, United had recovered only $14,281. Further, United was not able to provide evidence of additional control enhancements designed to prevent duplicate payments. Of the initial report’s four recommendations, one was implemented, two were partially implemented, and one was not implemented.

 

Establishing a cause of action based on negligent hiring, negligent retention, or negligent supervision

In this action to recover damages for alleged employment discrimination in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law and the New York City Human Rights Law filed by two teachers [Plaintiffs] employed by the New York City Department of Education [DOE], DOE moved to dismiss Plaintiffs' seeking recover damages from DOE for alleged negligent hiring, training, and supervision of one of its employees. Supreme Court granted DOE's motion and Plaintiffs appealed the court's decision.

The Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's granting this motion by DOE for Plaintiffs' failure "to state a cause of action." 

Citing S.C. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 97 AD3d 518, 519-520, quoting Shor v Touch-N-Go Farms, Inc., 89 AD3d 830, the Appellate Division explained that in order "[to] establish a cause of action based on negligent hiring, negligent retention, or negligent supervision [of an employee], it must be shown that the employer knew or should have known of the employee's propensity for the conduct which caused the injury."

The Appellate Division opined that Supreme Court properly directed the dismissal of that branch of the Plaintiffs' complaint as Plaintiffs failed to sufficiently allege that DOE knew or should have known of its employee's propensity to commit the wrongful acts "alleged in the second amended complaint." Further, the Appellate Division noted that Plaintiffs' submissions in opposition to DOE's motion failed to remedy this defect.

Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet.

Jul 31, 2023

New York State Comptroller DiNapoli releases municipal and school audits

New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli announced the following municipal and school district audits were issued on July 28, 2023.

Click on the text highlighted in color to access the entire audit report.

Town of Lake Luzerne – Procurement (Warren County)

The board did not enforce the provisions of the town’s procurement policy, and as a result, town officials did not seek competition when procuring goods and services totaling $561,829, or 48%, of the purchases reviewed. Because officials did not always comply with competitive bidding statutes and the town’s procurement policy, the board cannot ensure officials are procuring goods and services in the most prudent and economical manner.

 

Town of Lake Luzerne – Payroll (Warren County)

The supervisor did not ensure payroll payments were accurate or in accordance with town policies. Town officials did not properly review and certify payroll and 15 of 54 payroll registers reviewed were not certified. Officials also accepted incomplete time records for processing payroll and none of the 67 timecards reviewed contained all punches for time in/out. Additionally, inaccurately calculated overtime payments to hourly employees resulted in overpayments of $8,052 out of $47,192 overtime payments reviewed. Officials also did not always pay wages at board-approved rates, resulting in a $13,650 annual increase to the town’s payroll that the board did not approve.

 

City of Amsterdam – Recreation Department (Montgomery County)

The recreation director maintained limited and inadequate collection records and staff did not issue receipts for collections or maintain inventory records for the beverage events. As a result, there is a substantial risk that not all collections were remitted. For example: the total projected fees for the six-week summer camp program were $12,014; however, only $5,213 was collected; $4,303 was deposited from sales during the eight-hour Oktoberfest but officials did not maintain any support for the number of beverages sold;  for the $895 in cash that was remitted for the four-hour Craft Beer Fest the day of the event, officials could not support the number of tickets sold for the event; and auditors found $286 was remitted for the 10-hour Italiafest and wine tasting with no record of how many people attended the event.

 

Town of Johnsburg – North Creek Water District Charges (Warren County)

Town officials did not effectively manage the North Creek Water District's billing of water charges. This resulted in the town not billing for $8,461 (6%) of the water revenues it was entitled to. Officials did not ensure services provided by a contractor were billed to the customers or identify and bill all new water customers and ensure all water rates were board-adopted and accurately charged to customers.

 

Tuckahoe Union Free School District – Overtime (Westchester County)

District officials did not monitor overtime or ensure it was accurate. As a result, overtime payments increased the amount owed by a district, annually to the state, for its share of the cost of future employee retirement benefits. District officials did not adopt written policies and procedures for overtime and overpaid 15 employees a total of $4,432 for overtime due to lack of adequate review of time records and paid 15 employees overtime totaling $324,934 primarily for routine anticipated events.

 

Hannibal Fire Company – Misappropriation of Funds (Oswego County)

The board did not establish basic internal controls over cash disbursements. As a result, the former treasurer was able to misappropriate over $850,000 in company funds during an eight-and-a-half-year period. These improper disbursements went unnoticed for years because the board did not review bills paid by the former treasurer, receive written financial reports or review bank and investment statements and canceled check images. The board also did not obtain an annual independent audit of company records, as required.

 

Jericho Union Free School District – Acceptable Use Policy (Nassau County)

District officials did not help safeguard personal, private and sensitive information (PPSI) by developing and communicating a comprehensive acceptable use policy to business office staff. As a result, PPSI related to district employees and finances could be exposed. In addition to sensitive information technology weaknesses that were communicated confidentially to officials, auditors found that all nine business office employees, including the assistant superintendent for business affairs, were not aware that they were expected to follow the Computer Network and Internet Student Acceptable Use policy or what the district considers to be appropriate and inappropriate Internet use. District officials did not periodically review web histories to determine whether any employee’s web browsing was inappropriate.

 

Heuvelton Central School District – Procurement (St. Lawrence County)

District officials did not always comply with statutory requirements and the district’s procurement policy by seeking competition for the purchases of goods and services. As a result, they are unable to assure taxpayers that the district is procuring goods and services in the most prudent and economical manner. Officials could not support they used competition, as required, to make purchases totaling $189,497and did not seek competition when procuring professional services and insurance coverage from 10 vendors totaling $310,212. They also did not have written agreements with four of these vendors.

 

Son concealed mother’s death in order to continue receiving her retirement benefits

On July 28, 2023, New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli also announced the guilty plea of Charles Alton Bump Jr. to two counts of felony theft for stealing $53,320 in payments from the New York State Common Retirement Fund and Social Security Administration (SSA) that were sent to his deceased mother, Elizabeth Dorothy Case. Bump concealed his mother’s death and continued collecting her retirement and SSA payments. He stole $28,679 from the state pension fund and $24,641 from the SSA. Bump was sentenced to eight years in prison minus time already served and three years supervised probation. He was also ordered to pay restitution.

“Mr. Bump’s conviction should serve as a warning to those who try to defraud the New York State Pension system: we will pursue those who attempt to steal from the system wherever they may live,” DiNapoli said. “My office will continue to work with law enforcement agencies across the country to protect the New York State pension. I’m grateful to the Social Security Administration Office of Inspector General for their partnership in seeing that justice was served.”

Elizabeth Dorothy Case was a New York State employee and resident of Jamaica, Queens, who moved to Maryland to live with her son, Bump. In 2019, a concerned neighbor reported to the SSA that Case, who was approximately 90 years old at the time, had not been seen in over a year. After repeated attempts to contact her, the SSA requested that she appear in person in order to continue receiving her payments. When her son appeared instead, the SSA questioned him. He stated that she was out of the country on an extended tour of Europe and only reachable by e-mail. Authorities confirmed, however, that Case had no passport and had never left the country. Bump eventually admitted to officials that his mother had died and he had disposed of her body.

Following the joint investigation of the State Comptroller's Office and the SSA Office of the Inspector General, Bump, 62, was prosecuted by the State’s Attorney’s Office in Somerset County Maryland. He pled guilty in the District Court for Somerset County, Criminal.

###

Since taking office in 2007, DiNapoli has committed to fighting public corruption and encourages the public to help fight fraud and abuse. New Yorkers can report allegations of fraud involving taxpayer money by calling the toll-free Fraud Hotline at 1-888-672-4555, by filing a complaint online at https://www.osc.state.ny.us/investigations, or by mailing a complaint to: Office of the State Comptroller,  Division of Investigations, 8th Floor, 110 State St., Albany, NY 12236.

NYPPL Publisher Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; and Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com