ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN THE SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS PREPARED BY NYPPL

February 09, 2024

Municipal and School Audits released by New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli

On February 8, 2024, New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli announced the following local government and school audits were issued.

Click on the text highlighted in color to access both the summary of and the complete audit report

 

Garrison Union Free School District – Information Technology (IT) (Putnam County) District officials did not adequately secure the district’s network user accounts, establish physical controls, maintain complete and accurate inventory records for IT equipment or develop an IT contingency plan. Auditors found that district staff did not have sufficient documented guidance or plans to follow after an unexpected IT disruption or disaster. As a result, district officials have an increased risk they may not recover data and resume essential operations in a timely manner.

 

Town of Marion – Misappropriation of Justice Court Cash Collections (Wayne County) The justices and board did not provide adequate oversight of court financial activities. As a result, the former court clerk misappropriated more than $59,000, or 38%, of the fines, fees and surcharges collected between Jan. 1, 2016 through May 31, 2021. In August 2023, the former court clerk pleaded guilty to grand larceny in the second degree, corrupting the government in the second degree, tampering with records in the first degree and official misconduct. In October 2023, the former court clerk was sentenced to serve six months in jail and pay more than $59,000 in restitution. The justices did not perform a proper review of reports submitted to New York state agencies to ensure that all cases, including any cash collected, were properly reported and remitted. The justices failed to perform an adequate review of bank reconciliations or accountabilities to ensure that all collections were accurately accounted for and to promptly identify discrepancies or review deleted transactions reports. In addition, the board did not perform a proper annual audit.

 

Village of Washingtonville – Budget Review (Orange County) The scope of the review was significantly limited by the village’s lack of complete, accurate and current accounting records. Specifically, the village does not maintain up-to-date budget-to-actual reports to aid in the monitoring of its fiscal performance. The 2024-25 tentative budget includes sewer meter rents revenue of $1.6 million, Orange County sales tax revenue of $1.2 million, and water meter rents revenue of $1.1 million, but auditors were unable to project the amount the village will receive as most of revenue has not been posted in the financial software for 2022-23 or 2023-24. The 2024-25 tentative budget includes personal services of $3.4 million, employee benefits of $1.8 million, retirement expenditures of $675,000 and debt service of $542,000. Auditors were unable to project the amount the village may spend, as the village did not provide salary schedules and most of the expenditures have not been posted in the financial software for 2022-23 or 2023-24. The 2024-25 tentative budget includes a $100,000 general fund contingency and a $20,000 water fund contingency. There is no contingency for the sewer fund. Given the potential cost overruns from current economic conditions and the lack of complete, accurate, and current accounting and financial records, the board needs to consider whether the contingency appropriations are adequate and appropriate for unanticipated events and uncertainties.

 

Willsboro Central School District – Student State Aid (Essex County) District officials did not properly claim state aid for special education students who received services in summer placements. As a result, as of June 30, 2023, the district had not claimed $55,771 in state aid to which it was entitled, of which $52,640 would have already been received and benefited the district if claimed in a timely manner. The district also claimed $8,569 in aid to which it was not entitled. District officials also did not establish adequate procedures to ensure state aid was properly claimed for all special education students and also did not provide oversight over the official who prepared and submitted state aid claims.

###

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the decisions summarized here. Accordingly, these summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
New York Public Personnel Law Blog Editor Harvey Randall served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; and Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
Copyright 2009-2024 - Public Employment Law Press. Email: nyppl@nycap.rr.com.