ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN PREPARING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS

February 12, 2025

Engaging in a physical altercation and disrupting the workplace

New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings [OATH] Administrative Law Judge [ALJ] Tiffany Hamilton recommended a 60-day suspension for a hospital employee [Employee] found guilty of initiating a physical altercation with a coworker and disrupting the workplace.

The ALJ found Employee had struck the coworker in the face after the coworker demanded an apology from the Employee for behavior the coworker perceived to be disrespectful. Judge Hamilton also found that the witness reports and testimony established that Employee had caused a workplace disruption by yelling, fighting, and knocking over a water dispenser.

The Appointing Authority had sought termination of Employee for the proved charges, but Judge Hamilton found imposing the penalty of dismissal to be excessive. The ALJ noted that while Employee's misconduct was troubling, the principles of progressive discipline and mitigating circumstances, such as Employee’s commendable work history of almost 20 years, his initial attempts to avoid the altercation, and coworker testimony regarding his professionalism, supported a finding that a lesser penalty should be imposed and so recommended the Employee suspended without pay for sixty days and be retained in his position.

Click HERE to access Judge Hamilton's findings and recommendation posted on the Internet.

___________________________

 

A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances - The text of this ebook focuses on determining an appropriate disciplinary penalty to be imposed on an employee in the public service in instances where the employee has been found guilty of misconduct or incompetence. For more information click HERE.

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
NYPPL Publisher Harvey Randall, Esq. served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard [See also https://www.linkedin.com/in/harvey-randall-9130a5178/]. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com