ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] IS NOT USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN PREPARING NYPPL SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS

February 13, 2025

New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli announced the following local government were issued on February 13, 2025

 Click on the text highlighted in color to access the item posted on the Internet.

Cuddebackville Fire District – Board Oversight (Orange County)

The board did not provide adequate oversight of the district’s financial operations or properly audit claims. As a result, the board hindered their ability to make informed financial decisions. Complete, accurate and reliable accounting records were not maintained. For example, the Dec. 31, 2022 ending bank statement balances differed from the ending cash balances in the accounting records by $638,485. The board also used unrealistic budgetary estimates that resulted in annual operating deficits and a declining fund balance. The board did not ensure the treasurer maintained complete and accurate accounting records, requested or received regular financial reports or ensured claims were properly audited prior to payment. Although the board paid a CPA $6,750 to conduct the 2019 and 2020 audits, the CPA did not complete the 2020 audit and has possession of the district’s financial records. The board was unaware the audit was not completed and took no action.

Town of Clifton Park – Physical Accessibility to Programs and Services (Saratoga County) Of the 562 applicable physical accessibility components reviewed, auditors identified 47(8%) where town officials could consider taking additional steps to increase physical accessibility at selected town facilities.

Town of Trenton – Physical Accessibility to Programs and Services (Oneida County) Of the 144 applicable physical accessibility components reviewed, auditors identified 14(10%) where town officials could consider taking additional steps to increase physical accessibility at the Town Municipal Center.

City of Auburn – Physical Accessibility to Programs and Services (Cayuga County) Of the 538 applicable physical accessibility components reviewed, auditors identified 70(13%) where city officials could consider taking additional steps to increase physical accessibility at selected city facilities.

Town of Woodbury – Physical Accessibility to Programs and Services (Orange County) Of the 595 applicable physical accessibility components reviewed, auditors identified 131(22%) where town officials could consider taking additional steps to increase physical accessibility at selected town facilities.

City of Norwich – Physical Accessibility to Programs and Services (Chenango County) Of the 317 applicable physical accessibility components reviewed, auditors identified 30(9%) where city officials could consider taking additional steps to increase physical accessibility at selected city facilities.

Town of Penfield – Physical Accessibility to Programs and Services (Monroe County) Of the 679 applicable physical accessibility components reviewed, auditors identified 58(9%) where town officials could consider taking additional steps to increase physical accessibility at selected town facilities.

###

 

CAUTION

Subsequent court and administrative rulings, or changes to laws, rules and regulations may have modified or clarified or vacated or reversed the information and, or, decisions summarized in NYPPL. For example, New York State Department of Civil Service's Advisory Memorandum 24-08 reflects changes required as the result of certain amendments to §72 of the New York State Civil Service Law to take effect January 1, 2025 [See Chapter 306 of the Laws of 2024]. Advisory Memorandum 24-08 in PDF format is posted on the Internet at https://www.cs.ny.gov/ssd/pdf/AM24-08Combined.pdf. Accordingly, the information and case summaries should be Shepardized® or otherwise checked to make certain that the most recent information is being considered by the reader.
THE MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AGAIN, CHANGES IN LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NEW COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS MAY AFFECT THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS LAWBLOG. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE, OR CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING SUCH MATERIAL, DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
NYPPL Publisher Harvey Randall, Esq. served as Principal Attorney, New York State Department of Civil Service; Director of Personnel, SUNY Central Administration; Director of Research, Governor’s Office of Employee Relations; Staff Judge Advocate General, New York Guard [See also https://www.linkedin.com/in/harvey-randall-9130a5178/]. Consistent with the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations, the material posted to this blog is presented with the understanding that neither the publisher nor NYPPL and, or, its staff and contributors are providing legal advice to the reader and in the event legal or other expert assistance is needed, the reader is urged to seek such advice from a knowledgeable professional.
New York Public Personnel Law. Email: publications@nycap.rr.com